Reference health

The Impact of Managers’ Risk Aversion and Loss Aversion on Audit Quality Demand

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3425666
CiteStamped reference-health badge
15 of 60 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-07

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

8 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1016/j.jacceco.-2007.11.002
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/s0165-4101
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/0165-4101(81
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/s0165-4101(98
does not resolve to a known work10.1111/j.1911-3846.-2010.01027.x
does not resolve to a known work10.1506/-p9fj-ekal-fpjq-cm9n
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/-j.jacceco.2005.01.002
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/j.jacceco.2016.04.0-01
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/-0304405x
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/s0165-4101(02
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/s0165-4101(00)0-0025-2
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/s0361-3682(01
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/j.jebo.2009.02-.010
does not resolve to a known work10.2308/accr.2004.79.-3.797
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/0165-4101
The 45 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01026.x
Corporate Governance in the Post‐Sarbanes‐Oxley Era: Auditors’ Experiences*
resolves10.1037/a0022641
Introducing the GASP scale: A new measure of guilt and shame proneness.
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.09.004
Managerial incentives and risk-taking☆
resolves10.1016/s0165-4101(00)00005-7
The impact of improved auditor independence on audit market concentration in China
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
A review of archival auditing research
resolves10.2139/ssrn.3309678
Do Managers Successfully Shop for Compliant Auditors? Evidence from Accounting Estimates
resolves10.1111/1911-3846.12079
Management Influence on Auditor Selection and Subsequent Impairments of Auditor Independence during the Post‐<scp>SOX</scp> Period
resolves10.2308/accr-52556
Managing the Auditor-Client Relationship Through Partner Rotations: The Experiences of Audit Firm Partners
resolves10.1108/15265940810894990
Defining and measuring business risk in an economic‐capital framework
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.001
Issues raised by studying DeFond and Zhang: What should audit researchers do?
resolves10.2308/accr-52508
Do Investors Value Higher Financial Reporting Quality, and Can Expanded Audit Reports Unlock This Value?
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.08.001
Audit committee compensation and the demand for monitoring of the financial reporting process
resolves10.1016/0165-4101(91)90009-d
Empirical assessment of the impact of auditor quality on the valuation of new issues
resolves10.1111/1911-3846.12004
How Do Regulatory Reforms to Enhance Auditor Independence Work in Practice?
resolves10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4
z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments
resolves10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.35
Assessing France's Joint Audit Requirement: Are Two Heads Better than One?
resolves10.1257/0002828053828662
Deception: The Role of Consequences
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.08.003
Auditor choice in privatized firms: Empirical evidence on the role of state and foreign owners
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00737.x
Do Professional Traders Exhibit Myopic Loss Aversion? An Experimental Analysis
resolves10.1080/03637750903310360
Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium
resolves10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.839
Corporate Governance and Internal Control over Financial Reporting: A Comparison of Regulatory Regimes
resolves10.1257/000282802762024700
Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects
resolves10.1080/10705519909540118
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives
resolves10.1007/s10683-008-9208-2
Would I lie to you? On social preferences and lying aversion
resolves10.2308/ajpt-52478
Market Reactions to a High-Quality Auditor and Managerial Preference for Audit Quality
resolves10.2308/accr-52224
Realigning Auditors' Accountability: Experimental Evidence
resolves10.1177/1073191113514105
Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3)
resolves10.2307/1914185
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
resolves10.1257/jep.5.1.193
Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias
resolves10.1016/j.jet.2004.03.009
An index of loss aversion
resolves10.1162/qjec.121.4.1133
A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences*
resolves10.1257/aer.97.4.1047
Reference-Dependent Risk Attitudes
resolves10.1111/1475-679x.12197
The Impact of Consulting Services on Audit Quality: An Experimental Approach
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.06.004
Consistency in meeting or beating earnings expectations and management earnings forecasts
resolves10.1506/k2cg-u6v0-nptc-eqbk
Management Ownership and Audit Firm Size*
resolves10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.130
Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.
resolves10.1111/1475-679x.00030
Auditor Reputation Building
resolves10.2308/aud.2001.20.2.49
The Effect of Accounting Uncertainty and Auditor Reputation on Auditor Objectivity
resolves10.1509/jmkr.42.2.119.62292
The Boundaries of Loss Aversion
resolves10.1037/a0020141
A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation.
resolves10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00042-3
Empirical evidence on the relation between stock option compensation and risk taking
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.01.002
Earnings management through real activities manipulation
resolves10.5465/amj.2007.27156438
Swinging for the Fences: The Effects of Ceo Stock Options on Company Risk Taking and Performance
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.09.001
Executive overconfidence and the slippery slope to financial misreporting
resolves10.2307/2674675
An Assessment of Laboratory Experiments in Accounting
The 8 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedThe association between changes in client firm agency costs and auditor switching
no DOI — not checkedAuditor changes: A joint test of theories relating to agency costs and auditor differentiation
no DOI — not checkedThe effect of accounting context on accounting decisions: A synthesis of cognitive and economic perspectives in accounting experimentation
no DOI — not checkedExamining risk preferences under high monetary incentives: Experimental evidence from the People's Republic of China
no DOI — not checkedReputation formation for reliable reporting: An experimental investigation
no DOI — not checkedProduct differentiation in auditing: Auditor choice in the market for unseasoned new issues
no DOI — not checkedref68
no DOI — not checkedref69
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-07 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3425666"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3425666/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3425666/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3425666)