Reference health

Investors’ Response to the #MeToo Movement: Does Corporate Culture Matter?

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3466326
CiteStamped reference-health badge
23/23 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

42 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 23 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2018.09.004
Do women managers keep firms out of trouble? Evidence from corporate litigation and policies
resolves10.1093/qje/qjr049
The Changing of the Boards: The Impact on Firm Valuation of Mandated Female Board Representation *
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101875
#MeToo: Sexual harassment and company value
resolves10.1002/smj.4250090712
The economic efficiency of corporate culture
resolves10.1111/1911-3846.12286
Executive Gender Pay Gaps: The Roles of Female Risk Aversion and Board Representation
resolves10.1016/j.jempfin.2018.07.003
Female board representation, corporate innovation and firm performance
resolves10.1016/j.jempfin.2019.06.002
Why female board representation matters: The role of female directors in reducing male CEO overconfidence
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.08.008
Boards: Does one size fit all☆
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02724.x
Measuring Mutual Fund Performance with Characteristic‐Based Benchmarks
resolves10.1002/smj.1955
Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2003.12.001
Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender
resolves10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.12.003
Female directors, board committees and firm performance
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101526
Do board gender quotas affect firm value? Evidence from California Senate Bill No. 826
resolves10.1086/226425
Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women
resolves10.1257/aer.p20161032
Gender Diversity on Corporate Boards: Do Women Contribute Unique Skills?
resolves10.1086/467391
Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511571657.006
Corporate culture and economic theory
resolves10.1162/REST_a_00668
Women Helping Women? Evidence from Private Sector Data on Workplace Hierarchies
resolves10.1257/aer.101.3.635
Chipping away at the Glass Ceiling: Gender Spillovers in Corporate Leadership
resolves10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.109
Organizational culture.
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.01.004
Female leadership and gender equity: Evidence from plant closure
resolves10.1007/s10551-011-0815-z
Women Directors on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to Critical Mass
The 42 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedState Street votes against 400 companies citing gender diversity
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checked#MeToo brought down 201 powerful men. Nearly Half of Their Replacements Are Women
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedResearch: what inclusive companies have in common
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedGoldman Sachs won't take companies public if they have all-male corporate boards
no DOI — not checkedCritical mass: does the number of women on a corporate board make a difference?
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedGuidance on board effectiveness
no DOI — not checkedBig investors seek a #MeToo clawback
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedEndogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO
no DOI — not checkedBlackRock supports effort to boost number of women board members
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checked5 Strategies for creating an inclusive workplace
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedCritical mass: the impact of three or more women on corporate boards
no DOI — not checkedBlackRock: companies should have at least two female directors
no DOI — not checkedGender diversity in corporate boards: evidence from quota-implied discontinuities
no DOI — not checkedIf corporate diversity works, show me the money
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedTech investors include #MeToo clauses in start-up deals
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedref56
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedref58
no DOI — not checkedSexual harassment in the Fortune 500
no DOI — not checkedref61
no DOI — not checkedThe legal implications of the MeToo movement
no DOI — not checkedref65
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3466326"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3466326/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3466326/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3466326)