Reference health

A Journal-Based Replication of 'Being Chosen to Lead'

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3480708
CiteStamped reference-health badge
51/51 checkable references clean · checked 2026-09-09

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

16 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 51 checked references that resolve
resolves10.3386/w24003
When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?
resolves10.1257/aer.91.5.1369
The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation
resolves10.1257/aer.102.6.3077
The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply
resolves10.1093/ije/dyv127
Re-analysis of health and educational impacts of a school-based deworming programme in western Kenya: a pure replication
resolves10.1257/aer.102.6.3059
The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Comment
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2015.05.018
Measuring time preferences: A comparison of experimental methods
resolves10.1093/qje/qjv020
Working over Time: Dynamic Inconsistency in Real Effort Tasks *
resolves10.1257/aer.p20171119
Assessing the Rate of Replication in Economics
resolves10.1177/1745691617693624
Registered Replication Report: Rand, Greene, and Nowak (2012)
resolves10.1257/app.20150044
Star Wars: The Empirics Strike Back
resolves10.3386/w23335
An Economic Approach to Alleviate the Crises of Confidence in Science: With an Application to the Public Goods Game
resolves10.1162/rest.90.3.414
Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors
resolves10.1007/s10683-020-09658-8
Best practices in replication: a case study of common information in coordination games
resolves10.1257/jel.20171350
Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research
resolves10.1257/jep.29.3.81
Pre-Analysis Plans Have Limited Upside, Especially Where Replications Are Feasible
resolves10.1257/jel.48.2.424
Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development
resolves10.1093/restud/rdx033
What Motivates Effort? Evidence and Expert Forecasts
resolves10.1162/00335530151144050
The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime
resolves10.1162/qjec.2008.123.1.425
Measurement Error, Legalized Abortion, and the Decline in Crime: A Response to Foote and Goetz<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.03.001
Does “being chosen to lead” induce non-selfish behavior? Experimental evidence on reciprocity
resolves10.1073/pnas.1516179112
Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012
Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication
resolves10.3982/ecta9035
Vote-Buying and Reciprocity
resolves10.1162/qjec.2008.123.1.407
The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime: Comment<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1086/701681
Experimenting with Measurement Error: Techniques with Applications to the Caltech Cohort Study
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2181654
Statistical Analysis of Results from Laboratory Studies in Experimental Economics: A Critique of Current Practice
resolves10.1093/ije/dyv129
Commentary: Deworming externalities and schooling impacts in Kenya: a comment on Aiken<i>et al.</i>(2015) and Davey<i>et al.</i>(2015)
resolves10.1257/aer.90.5.1209
Does Competition Among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers?
resolves10.1257/jel.48.2.399
Better LATE Than Nothing: Some Comments on Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzua (2009)
resolves10.1073/pnas.1608676113
Association between contextual dependence and replicability in psychology may be spurious
resolves10.1093/pan/mpw012
Why Experimenters Might Not Always Want to Randomize, and What They Could Do Instead
resolves10.1037/met0000209
The unappreciated heterogeneity of effect sizes: Implications for power, precision, planning of research, and replication.
resolves10.1177/2515245918810225
Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings
resolves10.1037/bul0000220.supp
Supplemental Material for Crowdsourcing Hypothesis Tests: Making Transparent How Design Choices Shape Research Results
resolves10.1111/ectj.12107
The wild bootstrap for few (treated) clusters
resolves10.1108/s0193-230620150000018008
How to Make Experimental Economics Research More Reproducible: Lessons from Other Disciplines and a New Proposal
resolves10.1111/ecoj.12527
To Replicate or Not to Replicate? Exploring Reproducibility in Economics through the Lens of a Model and a Pilot Study
resolves10.1080/00031305.2018.1505655
Large-Scale Replication Projects in Contemporary Psychological Research
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00481.x
Worms: Identifying Impacts on Education and Health in the Presence of Treatment Externalities
resolves10.1027/1864-9335/a000192
Registered Reports
resolves10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691
What is replication?
resolves10.4159/9780674041660
The Logic of Collective Action
resolves10.1126/science.aac4716
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
resolves10.1038/nature11467
Spontaneous giving and calculated greed
resolves10.1257/aer.97.5.2026
Does Competition Among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers? Comment
resolves10.1177/0956797611417632
False-Positive Psychology
resolves10.3386/w24781
Testing the Waters: Behavior across Participant Pools
resolves10.1037/bul0000169
What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
resolves10.3390/g6040473
Reciprocity in Labor Market Relationships: Evidence from an Experiment across High-Income OECD Countries
resolves10.1073/pnas.1909046117
Estimating the deep replicability of scientific findings using human and artificial intelligence
resolves10.1093/qje/qjy029
Channeling Fisher: Randomization Tests and the Statistical Insignificance of Seemingly Significant Experimental Results*
The 16 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedDecision Theoretic Approaches to Experiment Design and External Validity
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedReplication and Other Practices for Improving scientific Quality in Experimental Economics
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedThe Surprising Capacity of the Company You Keep: Revealing Group Cohesion as a Powerful Factor of Team Production
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedLet's Take the Con Out of Econometrics
no DOI — not checkedref56
no DOI — not checkedThe Effect of Replications on Citation Patterns: Evidence From a Large-Scale Reproducibility Project
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedJust Post It: The Lesson from Two Cases of Fabricated Data Detected by Statistics Alone
no DOI — not checkedref66
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-09-09 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3480708"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3480708/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3480708/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3480708)