Reference health

Measuring the Impact of a Single Negative Customer Review on Online Search and Purchase Decisions

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3483429
CiteStamped reference-health badge
11/11 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

4 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 11 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1509/jmkr.37.2.203.18734
Consumer Response to Negative Publicity: The Moderating Role of Commitment
resolves10.1016/0167-8116(95)00006-n
The effects of in-store displays and feature advertising on consideration sets
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02512.x
Learning from the Crowd: Regression Discontinuity Estimates of the Effects of an Online Review Database
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2018.11.002
Advertising for consideration
resolves10.1257/jep.31.2.3
The State of Applied Econometrics: Causality and Policy Evaluation
resolves10.1509/jmr.14.0380
The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales: A Meta-Analytic Review of Platform, Product, and Metric Factors
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00795.x
Exploring the Valence‐Framing Effect: Negative Framing Enhances Attitude Strength
resolves10.1353/jhr.2009.0009
Alternative Approaches to Evaluation in Empirical Microeconomics
resolves10.5962/bhl.title.59256
Alabama G-E-M resources area (GRA no. CA-09) : technical report (WSAs CA 010-057, 010-058, and 010-064) : final report /
resolves10.3389/fninf.2011.00026
001 058 002 059 003 060 004 061 005 062 006 063 007 064 008 065 009 066 010 067 011 068 012 069 013 070 014 071 015 072 016 073 017 074 018 075 019 076 020 077 021 078 022 079 023 080 024 081 025 082 026 083 027 084 028 085 029 086 030 087 031 088 032 089 033 090 034 091 035 092 036 093 037 094 038 095 039 096 040 097 041 098 042 099 043 100 044 101 045 102 046 103 047 104 048 105 049 106 050 107 051 108 052 109 053 110 054 111 055 112 056 113 057 114 NEUROINFORMATICS METHODS ARTICLE published: xx November 2011 doi: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00026 An in vivo MRI template set for morphometry, tissue segmentation, and fMRI localization in rats
resolves10.31096/wua023-collegian-20190501
Willamette Collegian 2019-05-01
The 4 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedHigh and Declining Prices Signal Product Quality
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref16
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3483429"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3483429/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3483429/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3483429)