Reference health
‘Do the Right Thing’ for Whom? An Experiment on Ingroup Favouritism, Group Assortativity and Moral Suasion
75/75 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
8 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 75 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2015.12.007
Using descriptive social norms to increase charitable giving: The power of local norms
resolves10.3982/ecta10637
Homo Moralis--Preference Evolution Under Incomplete Information and Assortative Matching
resolves10.3982/ecta7384
Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.5
Suppression, accessibility of death-related thoughts, and cultural worldview defense: Exploring the psychodynamics of terror management.
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2018.01.020
The psychology of intergroup conflict: A review of theories and measures
resolves10.31234/osf.io/tbhqa
Increasing altruistic and cooperative behaviour with simple moral nudges
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2965067
Do the Right Thing: Preferences for Moral Behavior, Rather Than Equity or Efficiency per se, Drive Human Prosociality
resolves10.1017/S1930297500004356
The power of moral words: Loaded language generates framing effects in the extreme dictator game
resolves10.1016/j.jbef.2015.12.001
oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments
resolves10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60330-5
A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior
resolves10.1002/nvsm.385
Gendered giving: the influence of social norms on the donation behavior of men and women
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.05.002
“Do the right thing:” The effects of moral suasion on cooperation
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2017.02.029
Push, don’t nudge: Behavioral spillovers and policy instruments
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.004
Costly punishment in the ultimatum game evokes moral concern, in particular when framed as payoff reduction
resolves10.31234/osf.io/mdbf2
Deliberation erodes cooperative behavior – even towards competitive out-groups, even when using a control condition, and even when eliminating selection bias
resolves10.1162/rest_a_00344
Using Nonpecuniary Strategies to Influence Behavior: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment
resolves10.1257/0002828043052187
Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior: Testing “Conditional Cooperation” in a Field Experiment
resolves10.1086/586910
A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels
resolves10.1162/0011526042365555
Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.02.003
The behavioralist as tax collector: Using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance
resolves10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199607)26:4<677::aid-ejsp777>3.0.co;2-2
The effects of mortality salience on intergroup bias between minimal groups
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2008.11.005
The focusing and informational effects of norms on pro-social behavior
resolves10.1111/jeea.12006
IDENTIFYING SOCIAL NORMS USING COORDINATION GAMES: WHY DOES DICTATOR GAME SHARING VARY?
resolves10.1257/jep.21.2.153
What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World?
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00875.x
The Association of Religiosity and Political Conservatism: The Role of Political Engagement
resolves10.1098/rstb.2011.0301
Evolution and the psychology of intergroup conflict: the male warrior hypothesis
resolves10.1007/s11211-012-0175-6
Lessons from Morality-Based Social Identity: The Power of Outgroup “Hate,” Not Just Ingroup “Love”
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0113826
Dictator Game Giving: The Importance of Descriptive versus Injunctive Norms
resolves10.1098/rspb.2014.1539
The evolutionary interplay of intergroup conflict and altruism in humans: a review of parochial altruism theory and prospects for its extension
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.998
Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance?
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.008
“Ingroup love” and “outgroup hate” in intergroup conflict between natural groups
resolves10.1108/eb018788
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: ACHIEVING A MORALLY ACCEPTABLE END BY MORALLY ACCEPTABLE MEANS
The 8 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedIs it good to cooperate
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref80
no DOI — not checkedref81
no DOI — not checkedref82
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3486398"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3486398/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3486398)