Reference health
The Relationship between Technical Progress and Employment: A Comment on Autor and Salomons
11/11 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-16
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 11 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1353/eca.2018.0000
Is Automation Labor Share-Displacing? Productivity Growth, Employment, and the Labor Share
resolves10.2139/ssrn.3377758
The Illusions of Calculating Total Factor Productivity and Testing Growth Models: From Cobb-Douglas to Solow and to Romer
resolves10.1006/jcec.2001.1733
Biased Technical Change, Growth Accounting, and the Conundrum of the East Asian Miracle
resolves10.1111/1467-999x.00166
Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists should Know
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02280.x
Output, Input and Productivity Measures at the Industry Level: The EU KLEMS Database
resolves10.1111/bjir.12165
Determinants of the Wage Share: A Panel Analysis of Advanced and Developing Economies
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedRobocalypse Now-Does Productivity Growth Threaten Employment?
no DOI — not checkedUnderstanding the Downward Trend in Labor Income Shares
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedComment on 'Does Productivity Growth Threaten Employment' by David Autor and Anna Salomons
no DOI — not checkedSome Approaches to the Theory and Measurement of Total Factor Productivity: A Survey
no DOI — not checkedRecent Exercises in Growth Accounting: New Understanding or Dead End
no DOI — not checkedComment
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-16 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3531153"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3531153/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3531153)