Reference health
Can Choice in the Lab Predict Actual Portfolio Choice?
109/109 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
9 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 109 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1257/aer.102.5.2272
Durable Consumption and Asset Management with Transaction and Observation Costs
resolves10.1111/1468-0475.00036
On the Interaction of Risk and Time Preferences: An Experimental Study
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00670.x
Risks for the Long Run: A Potential Resolution of Asset Pricing Puzzles
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00226
Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors
resolves10.1162/003355301556400
Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhm079
All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors
resolves10.1257/aer.96.4.1069
Individual Preferences, Monetary Gambles, and Stock Market Participation: A Case for Narrow Framing
resolves10.2307/2978737
The Asset Structure of Individual Portfolios and Some Implications for Utility Functions
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2013.1794
Do Individuals Have Preferences Used in Macro-Finance Models? An Experimental Investigation
resolves10.1111/jofi.12125
Twin Picks: Disentangling the Determinants of Risk‐Taking in Household Portfolios
resolves10.1007/bf01064045
Hope: An empirical study of attitude toward the timing of uncertainty resolution
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.01.003
Ambiguity aversion and household portfolio choice puzzles: Empirical evidence
resolves10.1257/aer.20130420
Comment on “Risk Preferences Are Not Time Preferences”: Balancing on a Budget Line
resolves10.2307/1913778
Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: A Theoretical Framework
resolves10.1111/jofi.12851
The Impact of Salience on Investor Behavior: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
resolves10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.505
Shrouded Attributes, Consumer Myopia, and Information Suppression in Competitive Markets
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhu075
Do Individual Investors Treat Trading as a Fun and Exciting Gambling Activity? Evidence from Repeated Natural Experiments
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00737.x
Do Professional Traders Exhibit Myopic Loss Aversion? An Experimental Analysis
resolves10.1257/000282802762024674
Estimating Individual Discount Rates in Denmark: A Field Experiment
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.10.006
Attention allocation and return co-movement: Evidence from repeated natural experiments
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhy109
Unleashing Animal Spirits: Self-Control and Overpricing in Experimental Asset Markets
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02751.x
Speculation Duopoly with Agreement to Disagree: Can Overconfidence Survive the Market Test?
resolves10.1007/s11166-011-9122-4
Preference towards control in risk taking: Control, no control, or randomize?
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhi033
Household Portfolio Diversification: A Case for Rank-Dependent Preferences
resolves10.3982/ecta9619
Temporal Resolution of Uncertainty and Recursive Models of Ambiguity Aversion
resolves10.1162/003355397555226
The Effect of Myopia and Loss Aversion on Risk Taking: An Experimental Test
The 9 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedA generalization of the quasilinear mean with applications to the measurement of income inequality and decision theory resolving the Allais paradox
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedResolving the excessive trading puzzle: An integrated approach based on surveys and transactions. working paper
no DOI — not checkedUnraveling in guessing games: An experimental study
no DOI — not checkedref105
no DOI — not checkedThe Ellsberg paradox and risk aversion: An anticipated utility approach
no DOI — not checkedref113
no DOI — not checkedAmbiguity attitudes. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3624937"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3624937/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3624937)