Reference health

The Polarizing Potential of Intergroup Affect in Online Political Discussions: Evidence From Reddit R/Politics

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3671497
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 69 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-11

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

16 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1080/10463280802079738?needAccess=true
The 68 checked references that resolve
resolves10.4135/9781446212165
The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods
resolves10.1037/0708-5591.35.1.11
On the nature of prejudice.
resolves10.1017/cbo9780511813740.010
The Contact Hypothesis Reconsidered: Interacting via Internet: Theoretical and Practical Aspects
resolves10.1111/jcc4.12009
The “Nasty Effect:” Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies
resolves10.1126/science.aaa1160
Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
resolves10.1093/pan/mpu011
Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data
resolves10.1177/0956797615594620
Tweeting From Left to Right
resolves10.1080/10584609.2016.1235639
Exposure to Political Disagreement in Social Media Versus Face-to-Face and Anonymous Online Settings
resolves10.2307/2785570
Measurement of Personal-Group Relations
resolves10.1111/0022-4537.00126
The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?
resolves10.1146/annurev.ps.36.020185.001251
The Psychology of Intergroup Attitudes and Behavior
resolves10.1093/jcmc/zmx002
Explaining the Emergence of Political Fragmentation on Social Media: The Role of Ideology and Extremism
resolves10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
PUBLIC DELIBERATION, DISCURSIVE PARTICIPATION, AND CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT: A Review of the Empirical Literature
resolves10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.460
Social Media and Intergroup Communication
resolves10.1111/jcom.12104
Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments
resolves10.1038/srep37825
Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook
resolves10.1007/s11109-014-9280-6
Ideological Social Identity: Psychological Attachment to Ideological In-Groups as a Political Phenomenon and a Behavioral Influence
resolves10.1086/230995
Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?
resolves10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media
resolves10.2307/2951734
On the Measurement of Polarization
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.74
The dark side of self- and social perception: Black uniforms and aggression in professional sports.
resolves10.1177/1461444813513259
Discourse architecture, ideology, and democratic norms in online political discussion
resolves10.1080/14792779343000004
The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias
resolves10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x
Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users
resolves10.1080/19331681.2014.997416
Incivility Online: Affective and Behavioral Reactions to Uncivil Political Posts in a Web-based Experiment
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.011
Homophily, group size, and the diffusion of political information in social networks: Evidence from Twitter
resolves10.1002/bdm.726
“In‐Group Love” and “Out‐Group Hate” in Repeated Interaction Between Groups
resolves10.1080/08824096.2014.989971
Playing Nice: Modeling Civility in Online Political Discussions
resolves10.5964/jspp.v7i1.1062
The individual and the nation: A qualitative analysis of US liberal and conservative identity content
resolves10.1007/s11127-007-9201-x
Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers
resolves10.1037/a0035582
Intergroup contact and intergroup conflict.
resolves10.1177/1046496404263424
The Social Identity Perspective
resolves10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00619.x
Failure and defeat as determinants of group cohesiveness
resolves10.1111/pops.12487
The Strengthening of Partisan Affect
resolves10.1111/jcom.12188
“I Don't Like You Any More”: Facebook Unfriending by Israelis During the Israel-Gaza Conflict of 2014
resolves10.1177/0894439316631043
Digital Trace Data in the Study of Public Opinion
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2005.01.001
Group-based emotions as determinants of ingroup identification
resolves10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.013
Intergroup contact through online comments: Effects of direct and extended contact on outgroup attitudes
resolves10.1037/apl0000006
Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance.
resolves10.1177/0093650209333030
Looking the Other Way
resolves10.1002/9781118426456.ch18
Selective Exposure in the Communication Technology Context
resolves10.1080/15283488.2014.921170
Intergroup Identity Insults: A Social Identity Theory Perspective
resolves10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199747672.013.0006
Retribution and Revenge
resolves10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00130.x
Intergroup Emotions and Intergroup Relations
resolves10.1007/s11211-010-0114-3
More than Ideology: Conservative–Liberal Identity and Receptivity to Political Cues
resolves10.1080/08838151.2016.1273922
Online Political Discourse: Exploring Differences in Effects of Civil and Uncivil Disagreement in News Website Comments
resolves10.1080/00380237.1974.10571409
Interracial Contact and the Reduction of Prejudice
resolves10.1111/ajps.12330
The Economic Consequences of Partisanship in a Polarized Era
resolves10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01627.x
Collective Action as the Material Expression of Opinion‐Based Group Membership
resolves10.1177/1368430218761568
When contact goes wrong: Negative intergroup contact promotes generalized outgroup avoidance
resolves10.1002/ejsp.2420220202
Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration
resolves10.1017/xps.2020.14
Don’t @ Me: Experimentally Reducing Partisan Incivility on Twitter
resolves10.1145/1753326.1753543
Presenting diverse political opinions
resolves10.1177/1077699016644196p
Book Review: <i>In-Your-Face Politics: The Consequences of Uncivil Media</i> by Diana C. Mutz
resolves10.1177/009365098025006006
Breaching or Building Social Boundaries?
resolves10.1111/jcc4.12191
Incivility and Political Identity on the Internet: Intergroup Factors as Predictors of Incivility in Discussions of News Online
resolves10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.022
Dangerous minds? Effects of uncivil online comments on aggressive cognitions, emotions, and behavior
resolves10.1080/10510970701341063
Communication and Social Identity Theory: Existing and Potential Connections in Organizational Identification Research
resolves10.1017/9781108560573
Frenemies
resolves10.1038/s41562-019-0541-6
The wisdom of polarized crowds
resolves10.1080/10584609.2010.542360
From Incivility to Outrage: Political Discourse in Blogs, Talk Radio, and Cable News
resolves10.1017/cbo9781107477971
Negativity in Democratic Politics
resolves10.1177/104649602237170
Computer-Mediated Communication as a Channel for Social Resistance
resolves10.1177/1940161217740697
The Polarizing Effects of Online Partisan Criticism: Evidence from Two Experiments
resolves10.1177/2158244020919447
The Dynamics of Political Incivility on Twitter
resolves10.3200/socp.146.6.685-699
The Janus Face of Power in Intergroup Contexts: A Further Exploration of the Noblesse Oblige Effect
resolves10.1177/1461444809342775
‘Don’t talk to me’: effects of ideologically homogeneous online groups and politically dissimilar offline ties on extremism
The 16 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedCross-Ideological Discussions Among Conservative and Liberal Bloggers
no DOI — not checkedIntergroup Theory and Communication Processes
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedref63
no DOI — not checkedPlayful Participatory Culture: Learning from Reddit
no DOI — not checkedPersonal and Public Levels of Political Incivility
no DOI — not checkedA Review of Sentiment Computation Methods With R Packages
no DOI — not checkedref88
no DOI — not checkedref90
no DOI — not checkedref102
no DOI — not checkedref104
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-11 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3671497"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3671497/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3671497/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3671497)