At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in
Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the
registry record that put it there.
The 131 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/1907921Le Comportement de l'Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l'Ecole Americaine
resolves10.1257/aer.104.10.3003The Short-Run and Long-Run Effects of Behavioral Interventions: Experimental Evidence from Energy Conservation
resolves10.1017/bpp.2021.6Nudge plus: incorporating reflection into behavioral public policy
resolves10.1007/s10603-014-9266-0The Persistent Impacts of Norm-Based Messaging and Their Implications for Water Conservation
resolves10.1162/qjec.2009.124.1.51Beyond Revealed Preference: Choice-Theoretic Foundations for Behavioral Welfare Economics<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.06.001Boundedly rational consumers, energy and investment literacy, and the display of information on household appliances
resolves10.3386/w23277Do The Effects of Nudges Persist? Theory and Evidence from 38 Natural Field Experiments
resolves10.2307/3312889Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for "Asymmetric Paternalism"
resolves10.3386/w18565Active vs. Passive Decisions and Crowdout in Retirement Savings Accounts: Evidence from Denmark
resolves10.1017/bpp.2018.29Message and Environment: a framework for nudges and choice architecture
resolves10.1016/j.reseneeco.2021.101221The impact of smart meters on residential water consumption: Evidence from a natural experiment in the Canary Islands
resolves10.1162/00335530360698432The Role of Information and Social Interactions in Retirement Plan Decisions: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment
resolves10.1257/app.2.4.213Put Your Money Where Your Butt Is: A Commitment Contract for Smoking Cessation
resolves10.1017/bpp.2020.6‘Better off, as judged by themselves’: do people support nudges as a method to change their own behavior?
resolves10.1017/s0266267118000032TOWARD A FRAMEWORK FOR SELECTING BEHAVIOURAL POLICIES: HOW TO CHOOSE BETWEEN BOOSTS AND NUDGES
resolves10.1086/260547Risk, Probabilities, and a New Theory of Cardinal Utility
resolves10.1257/pol.20150261Can Small Incentives Have Large Effects? The Impact of Taxes versus Bonuses on Disposable Bag Use
resolves10.1080/1350178x.2015.1070527Preference purification and the inner rational agent: a critique of the conventional wisdom of behavioural welfare economics
resolves10.1017/bpp.2018.43When and why defaults influence decisions: a meta-analysis of default effects
resolves10.30636/jbpa.11.10How best to nudge taxpayers? The impact of message simplification and descriptive social norms on payment rates in a central London local authority
resolves10.1177/1043463120937832Do Koreans like being nudged? Survey evidence for the contextuality of behavioral public policy
resolves10.2105/ajph.2005.082073The Effectiveness of Vaccine Day and Educational Interventions on Influenza Vaccine Coverage Among Health Care Workers at Long-Term Care Facilities
resolves10.1111/joca.12181Which Europeans Like Nudges? Approval and Controversy in Four European Countries
resolves10.2307/2232669Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty
resolves10.1111/spc3.12297Unresolved questions in nudging research: Putting the psychology back in nudging
resolves10.1016/j.socec.2021.101683Review on Robert Sugden's “The Community of Advantage: A Behavioural Economist's Defence of the Market”. Oxford, July 17th 2018. 352 p. ISBN: 9780198825142
resolves10.3386/w17183Using Implementation Intentions Prompts to Enhance Influenza Vaccination Rates
resolves10.1017/bpp.2018.40Transparency effects on policy compliance: disclosing how defaults work can enhance their effectiveness
resolves10.1111/bjop.12428‘Three is better than two’: Increasing donations with the attraction effect
resolves10.2307/2185021Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing
resolves10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112395Public acceptability of nudging and taxing to reduce consumption of alcohol, tobacco, and food: A population-based survey experiment
resolves10.1257/jel.38.2.332Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk
resolves10.1509/jmr.14.0421Ethically Deployed Defaults: Transparency and Consumer Protection through Disclosure and Preference Articulation
resolves10.2307/2295722Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2019.05.007The asymmetric dominance effect: Reexamination and extension in risky choice – An experimental study
resolves10.1086/380085Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving
resolves10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052050Australian adult smokers’ responses to plain packaging with larger graphic health warnings 1 year after implementation: results from a national cross-sectional tracking survey
resolves10.1038/nclimate3316Household behaviour crowds out support for climate change policy when sufficient progress is perceived
resolves10.1093/ntr/ntu184Graphic Health Warnings on Cigarette Packs: How Long Before the Effects on Adolescents Wear Out?
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/aae5d7Measuring what works: quantifying greenhouse gas emission reductions of behavioural interventions to reduce driving, meat consumption, and household energy use
The 14 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedThe Little Book of Green Nudges
no DOI — not checkedTwo concepts of liberty
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedref61
no DOI — not checkedref64
no DOI — not checkedref79
no DOI — not checkedref88
no DOI — not checkedPsychology and economics
no DOI — not checkedThe expected utility model: its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations
no DOI — not checkedref120
no DOI — not checkedref137
no DOI — not checkedref140
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.