Reference health
Designing Reward Structure for Crowdfunding Campaigns
31/31 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
4 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 31 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1287/msom.2019.0825
Crowdsourcing and Crowdfunding in the Manufacturing and Services Sectors
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2019.3482
Rethinking Crowdfunding Platform Design: Mechanisms to Deter Misconduct and Improve Efficiency
resolves10.1287/isre.1120.0468
An Empirical Examination of the Antecedents and Consequences of Contribution Patterns in Crowd-Funded Markets
resolves10.2139/ssrn.3240094
Designing Rewards-Based Crowdfunding Campaigns for Strategic Contributors
resolves10.1287/msom.2019.0833
Signaling to the Crowd: Private Quality Information and Rewards-Based Crowdfunding
resolves10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.872
The Determinants of Crowdfunding Success: Evidence from Technology Projects
resolves10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.715
Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice.
resolves10.1016/j.im.2018.08.003
“The more options, the better?” Investigating the impact of the number of options on backers’ decisions in reward-based crowdfunding projects
resolves10.1525/cmr.2016.58.2.5
Financing by and for the Masses: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Crowdfunding
resolves10.1080/13691066.2014.916512
Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding
resolves10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.08.005
User entrepreneurs' multiple identities and crowdfunding performance: Effects through product innovativeness, perceived passion, and need similarity
resolves10.1002/mar.20268
Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: When “goods satiate”
resolves10.1287/isre.2018.0777
Reward-Based Crowdfunding Campaigns: Informational Value and Access to Venture Capital
resolves10.5465/amj.2018.0620
Gaining Legitimacy by Being Different: Optimal Distinctiveness in Crowdfunding Platforms
resolves10.1525/cmr.2016.58.2.88
What Goes around Comes Around? Rewards as Strategic Assets in Crowdfunding
resolves10.1016/j.im.2014.03.003
The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US
The 4 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedThe legitimacy threshold revisited: How prior successes and failures spill over to other endeavors on kickstarter
no DOI — not checkedref31
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3742853"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3742853/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3742853)