Reference health
Does Conferencing Feedback Improve Non-English Majors’ Paragraph-Writing? A Case Study in Vietnam
1 of 16 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-28
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
28 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/30044673
The 15 checked references that resolve
resolves10.19044/esj.2016.v12n28p361
The Effect of Indirect Written Corrective Feedback to Arabic Language Intermediate Students’ in Kuwait
resolves10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.241
The Significance of Teacher Feedback in EFL Writing for Tertiary Level Foreign Language Learners
resolves10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001
Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms
resolves10.17576/gema-2019-1902-08
A Case Study of Teacher Feedback on Thai University Students’ Essay Writing
resolves10.58680/rte19973872
Writing Conferences and the Weaving of Multi-Voiced Texts in College Composition
resolves10.18806/tesl.v11i2.633
Teachers' Practices and Students' Preferences for Feedback on Second Language Writing: A Case Study of Adult ESL Learners
resolves10.58680/rte199015491
I Want to Talk to Each of You: Collaboration and the Teacher-Student Writing Conference
resolves10.58680/rte198715575
Writing Conference Talk: Factors Associated with High- and Low-Rated Writing Conferences
The 28 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedApplying group dynamic assessment procedures to support EFL writing development: Learner achievement, learners' and teachers' perceptions
no DOI — not checkedWeb-based versus face-to-face interactionist dynamic assessment in essay writing classrooms -a comparative study
no DOI — not checkedThe efficacy of written corrective feedback on KFL learners' writing
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedAcademic writing and grammatical accuracy: The role of corrective feedback
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedWritten language acquisition: The role of response and the writing conference
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedThe test-taker's choice: an investigation of the effect of topic on language test performance
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedThe first five minutes: Setting the agenda in a writing conference
no DOI — not checkedDo what I tell you because you control your own writing
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref42
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3764225"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3764225/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3764225)