Reference health
Changing Diets – Testing the Impact of Knowledge and Information Nudges on Sustainable Dietary Choices
81/81 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
6 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 81 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002
A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation
resolves10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.002
The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents
resolves10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women.
resolves10.1016/j.gfs.2017.04.001
Could consumption of insects, cultured meat or imitation meat reduce global agricultural land use?
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.011
Drivers for global agricultural land use change: The nexus of diet, population, yield and bioenergy
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2016.03.012
The dynamics of behavior change: Evidence from energy conservation
resolves10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.006
(Not) Eating for the environment: The impact of restaurant menu design on vegetarian food choice
resolves10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.11.042
Assessing the environmental impacts of production- and consumption-side measures in sustainable agriculture intensification in the European Union
resolves10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.06.012
Do labels that convey minimal, redundant, or no information affect consumer perceptions and willingness to pay?
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.012
Carbon Label at a University Restaurant – Label Implementation and Evaluation
resolves10.1038/s41558-018-0354-z
Consumers underestimate the emissions associated with food but are aided by labels
resolves10.1007/s10806-015-9598-z
Determinants of Individual Attitudes Toward Animal Welfare-Friendly Food Products
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.082
Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories
resolves10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.04.002
Towards more sustainable food choices: Value priorities and motivational orientations
resolves10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.002
“Meatless days” or “less but better”? Exploring strategies to adapt Western meat consumption to health and sustainability challenges
resolves10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.001
Quantifying household waste of fresh fruit and vegetables in the EU
resolves10.1111/j.1365-277x.2010.01124.x
Consumers’ knowledge of healthy diets and its correlation with dietary behaviour
resolves10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.151
Towards a sustainable diet combining economic, environmental and nutritional objectives
resolves10.3758/bf03193146
G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences
resolves10.1038/s41558-019-0563-0
The accuracy of German citizens’ confidence in their climate change knowledge
resolves10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.001
Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use
resolves10.1016/j.jcps.2013.11.002
Seeing the world through GREEN‐tinted glasses: Green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.069
Household food waste: Drivers and potential intervention points for design – An extensive review
resolves10.1016/j.appet.2006.11.009
Food and sustainability: Do consumers recognize, understand and value on-package information on production standards?
resolves10.1007/s11747-019-00663-9
Consumer effects of front-of-package nutrition labeling: an interdisciplinary meta-analysis
resolves10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.12.004
Product labelling in the market for organic food: Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for different organic certification logos
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2015.06.009
Effects of informational nudges on consumer debt repayment behaviors
resolves10.1108/bfj-10-2019-0816
From isolated labels and nudges to sustained tinkering: assessing long-term changes in sustainable eating at a lunch restaurant
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/ab465d
Public perceptions of how to reduce carbon footprints of consumer food choices
resolves10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.04.008
Our own country is best: Factors influencing consumers’ sustainability perceptions of plant-based foods
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.033
How to improve consumers' environmental sustainability judgements of foods
resolves10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.038
Does environmental friendliness equal healthiness? Swiss consumers’ perception of protein products
resolves10.1007/s10584-018-2279-y
A new, valid measure of climate change understanding: associations with risk perception
resolves10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00619.x
The role of health consciousness, food safety concern and ethical identity on attitudes and intentions towards organic food
resolves10.1002/cb.1592
Informational nudges as an effective approach in raising awareness among young adults about the risk of future disability
resolves10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.052
Vegetarianism and meat consumption: A comparison of attitudes and beliefs between vegetarian, semi-vegetarian, and omnivorous subjects in Belgium
resolves10.1016/s0959-6526(03)00114-8
The use of eco-labeling like initiatives on food products to promote quality assurance—is there enough credibility?
resolves10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.100
Environmental knowledge and attitudes and behaviours towards energy consumption
resolves10.1126/science.aaq0216
Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers
resolves10.1007/s11002-008-9044-3
How behavioral decision research can enhance consumer welfare: From freedom of choice to paternalistic intervention
resolves10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.01.009
Review: Consumption-stage food waste reduction interventions – What works and how to design better interventions
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.037
Communicating the environmental impact of meat production: challenges in the development of a Swedish meat guide
resolves10.3389/fnut.2015.00009
Working toward Healthy and Sustainable Diets: The “Double Pyramid Model” Developed by the Barilla Center for Food and Nutrition to Raise Awareness about the Environmental and Nutritional Impact of Foods
resolves10.1080/00223891.2016.1231115
The Development and Validation of Brief and Ultrabrief Measures of Values
resolves10.1093/nutrit/nux043
Dual-process theory and consumer response to front-of-package nutrition label formats
resolves10.1016/j.appet.2013.08.008
A lack of appetite for information and computation. Simple heuristics in food choice
resolves10.1006/jevp.2001.0227
THE STRUCTURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: CONCERN FOR SELF, OTHER PEOPLE, AND THE BIOSPHERE
resolves10.1080/17524032.2017.1308402
Evaluating Consumer Understanding of the Swedish Meat Guide—A Multi-layered Environmental Information Tool Communicating Trade-offs When Choosing Food
resolves10.26420/austinjnutrifoodsci.2017.1089
Food Sustainability Knowledge and Its Relationship with Dietary Habits of College Students
resolves10.1177/0013916519875180
“Reduce Food Waste, Save Money”: Testing a Novel Intervention to Reduce Household Food Waste
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.029
Proposing a Novel Index Reflecting Both Climate Impact and Nutritional Impact of Food Products
resolves10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3
Sustainable Food Consumption: Exploring the Consumer “Attitude – Behavioral Intention” Gap
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.015
Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro-environmental behaviour: comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries
resolves10.1016/j.appet.2015.08.013
Does better for the environment mean less tasty? Offering more climate-friendly meals is good for the environment and customer satisfaction
resolves10.1177/0022242919825649
How to SHIFT Consumer Behaviors to be More Sustainable: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework
resolves10.1046/j.1440-6047.11.supp3.7.x
Nutrition knowledge and food consumption: can nutrition knowledge change food behaviour?
The 6 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedSustainable diets and biodiversity: directions and solutions for policy, research and action
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedGreenhouse Gas Emissions and Blue Water Use of Dutch Diets and Its Association with
no DOI — not checkedFood and health in Europe: a new basis for action
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3765248"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3765248/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3765248)