Reference health

Do Investors Care About Impact?

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3765659
CiteStamped reference-health badge
43/43 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

14 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 43 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1497.12080
Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions
resolves10.1177/0149206320969787
MTurk Research: Review and Recommendations
resolves10.1007/s10784-010-9121-y
An analysis of the relationship between the additionality of CDM projects and their contribution to sustainable development
resolves10.1086/261662
Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence
resolves10.2307/2234133
Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving
resolves10.1111/1468-0262.00302
Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism
resolves10.1007/s10683-017-9527-2
Conducting interactive experiments online
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.07.008
Impact investing
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhab037
Get Real! Individuals Prefer More Sustainable Investments
resolves10.1002/bs.3830090304
Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method
resolves10.1086/260265
A Theory of Social Interactions
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00843.x
Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility
resolves10.3386/w27710
Exit vs. Voice
resolves10.1007/s43546-020-00033-6
Impact investments: a call for (re)orientation
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00181
Home Bias at Home: Local Equity Preference in Domestic Portfolios
resolves10.1007/s10679-005-4997-z
Talk and Action: What Individual Investors Say and What They Do
resolves10.1006/game.1996.0081
Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.01.003
Disagreement, tastes, and asset prices
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2016.06.002
Moral relativism as a disconnect between behavioural and experienced warm glow
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S
The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits
resolves10.1257/0022051043004577
Field Experiments
resolves10.1111/jofi.12841
Do Investors Value Sustainability? A Natural Experiment Examining Ranking and Fund Flows
resolves10.2307/2676219
The Effect of Green Investment on Corporate Behavior
resolves10.1016/B978-0-444-53685-3.00004-0
Assessment and Estimation of Risk Preferences
resolves10.3386/w28595
Welfare Consequences of Sustainable Finance
resolves10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.23
Music, Pandas, and Muggers: On the Affective Psychology of Value.
resolves10.1093/rfs/14.3.659
Familiarity Breeds Investment
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.05.003
Individual investor mutual fund flows☆
resolves10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-S
Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction
resolves10.1016/j.socec.2016.05.005
The effect of effectiveness: Donor response to aid effectiveness in a direct mail fundraising experiment
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhn042
Mutual Fund Fees Around the World
resolves10.1017/S0022109011000123
The Influence of Affect on Beliefs, Preferences, and Financial Decisions
resolves10.1207/S15327760JPFM0102_2
Imagery, Affect, and Financial Judgment
resolves10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.08.015
Making an impact? The relevance of information on aid effectiveness for charitable giving. A laboratory experiment
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001
Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2019.02.003
The social cost of carbon revisited
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.011
Sustainable investing in equilibrium
resolves10.1093/rcfs/cfaa012
Feverish Stock Price Reactions to COVID-19*
resolves10.1111/jofi.12547
Why Do Investors Hold Socially Responsible Mutual Funds?
resolves10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006
The affect heuristic
resolves10.1162/003465303765299837
Understanding the Equity Home Bias: Evidence from Survey Data
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1100.1282
The Midweight Method to Measure Attitudes Toward Risk and Ambiguity
resolves10.1007/s10683-009-9230-z
Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments
The 14 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedWarm glow, information, and inefficient charitable giving
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref55
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3765659"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3765659/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3765659/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3765659)