Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
The 75 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/S0361-3682(96)00038-4Management control systems in research and development organizations: The role of accounting, behavior and personnel controls
resolves10.1506/VJR6-RP75-7GUX-XH0XAccounting for Flexibility and Efficiency: A Field Study of Management Control Systems in a Restaurant Chain*
resolves10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.732Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities.
resolves10.1037/a0025739Impact of high-performance work systems on individual- and branch-level performance: Test of a multilevel model of intermediate linkages.
resolves10.2308/bria.2007.19.1.43Strategic Performance Measurement Systems, Job-Relevant Information, and Managerial Behavioral Responses—Role Stress and Performance
resolves10.5465/annals.2014.0086An Aspirational View of Organizational Control Research: Re-invigorating Empirical Work to Better Meet the Challenges of 21
<sup>st</sup>
Century Organizations
resolves10.2308/jmar-17-068Management Control System Design and Employees' Autonomous Motivation
resolves10.1016/0361-3682(88)90001-3The effect of participative budgeting on job satisfaction and performance: Role ambiguity as an intervening variable
resolves10.2308/jmar-50356A Balancing Act? The Implications of Mixed Strategies for Performance Measurement System Design
resolves10.1080/09638180802652371The Relationship of Budgetary Participation and Reliance on Accounting Performance Measures with Individual-Level Consequent Variables: A Meta-Analysis
resolves10.1080/09638180.2014.918517Developing Enabling Performance Measurement Systems: On the Interplay Between Numbers and Operational Knowledge
resolves10.1111/puar.12049Employee Empowerment, Employee Attitudes, and Performance: Testing a Causal Model
resolves10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research
resolves10.1506/car.24.3.9Supply‐Chain Accounting Practices in the UK Retail Sector: Enabling or Coercing Collaboration?*
resolves10.1287/orsc.2019.1294Managing Autonomy in Industrial Research and Development: A Project-Level Investigation
resolves10.1080/09585190903509464High- and low-road strategies for competing on costs and their implications for employment relations: international studies in the airline industry1
resolves10.1111/1911-3846.12357Exploring the Roles of Vernacular Accounting Systems in the Development of “Enabling” Global Accounting and Control Systems
resolves10.2307/258338Development and Application of a Model of Personal Control in Organizations
resolves10.1016/j.mar.2012.01.001Why do employees take more initiatives to improve their performance after co-developing performance measures? A field study
resolves10.2307/2391213Relationship of Centralization to Other Structural Properties
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.004The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance
resolves10.1086/223508The Concept of Bureaucracy: An Empirical Assessment
resolves10.1002/job.1920Experimental evidence for the effects of task repetitiveness on mental strain and objective work performance
resolves10.1016/0749-5978(85)90020-2A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings
resolves10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.xCONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUALS' FIT AT WORK: A META‐ANALYSIS OF PERSON–JOB, PERSON–ORGANIZATION, PERSON–GROUP, AND PERSON–SUPERVISOR FIT
resolves10.1016/0361-3682(94)00031-PThe impact of reliance on accounting performance measures on job-related tension and managerial performance: Additional evidence
resolves10.1006/mare.1998.0074The impact of budget emphasis, participation and task difficulty on managerial performance: a cross-cultural study of the financial services sector
resolves10.2308/bria-50333The Effect of Managers' Enabling Perceptions on Costing System Use, Psychological Empowerment, and Task Performance
resolves10.1186/s41469-019-0062-9What makes self-managing organizations novel? Comparing how Weberian bureaucracy, Mintzberg’s adhocracy, and self-organizing solve six fundamental problems of organizing
resolves10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment.
resolves10.1257/jel.44.2.367Decentralization, Hierarchies, and Incentives: A Mechanism Design Perspective
resolves10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work.
resolves10.2307/2091811A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations
resolves10.2308/accr-52266Interrelation of Controls for Autonomous Motivation: A Field Study of Productivity Gains Through Pressure-Induced Process Innovation
resolves10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.
resolves10.1037/a0022676Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review.
resolves10.2307/256865PSYCHOLOGICAL, EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT AND VALIDATION.
resolves10.2307/256789SOCIAL STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT.
resolves10.2753/MIS0742-1222270203Systems Development Ambidexterity: Explaining the Complementary and Substitutive Roles of Formal and Informal Controls
resolves10.1111/1911-3846.12639Fostering Enabling Perceptions of Management Controls during Post‐Acquisition Integration*
resolves10.1007/s00187-021-00316-5The effect of enabling versus coercive performance measurement systems on procedural fairness and red tape
resolves10.2307/256941THE ROLE-BASED PERFORMANCE SCALE: VALIDITY ANALYSIS OF A THEORY-BASED MEASURE.
resolves10.2307/256134Measures of Perrow 's Work Unit Technology: An Empirical Assessment and a New Scale.
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01055.xUsing Prototypes to Induce Experimentation and Knowledge Integration in the Development of Enabling Accounting Information*
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.002Developing performance-measurement systems as enabling formalization: A longitudinal field study of a logistics department
resolves10.5465/amj.2010.48037118Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creative Process Engagement
The 17 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedUnderstanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the "strength" of the HRM system
no DOI — not checkedand the enabling use of performance measurement systems
no DOI — not checkedPay preferences and job search decisions: A personorganization fit perspective
no DOI — not checkedPerformance measurement systems, hierarchical accountability and enabling control
no DOI — not checkedThe effects of job standard tightness and compensation scheme on performance: An exploration of linkages
no DOI — not checkedHRM, communication, satisfaction, and perceived performance: A cross-level test
no DOI — not checkedManagement control and the decentralization of R&D
no DOI — not checkedItem grouping effects on invariance of attitude items
no DOI — not checkedThe impact of high performance human resource practices on employees' attitudes and behaviors
no DOI — not checkedManagement control systems. Performance measurement, evaluation, and incentives
no DOI — not checkedOrganizational tenure and job performance
no DOI — not checkedThe impact of management controls on public managers' wellbeing
no DOI — not checkedCognitive elements of empowerment: An "interpretive" model of intrinsic task motivation
no DOI — not checkedref82
no DOI — not checkedThe impact of enabling performance measurement on managers' autonomous work motivation and performance
no DOI — not checkedThe self-selection and effort effects of standardbased employment contracts: A framework and some empirical evidence
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.