Reference health
A Call for Structured Ethics Appendices in Social Science Papers
31/31 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
4 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 31 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1093/aepp/ppq023
The Power and Pitfalls of Experiments in Development Economics: Some Non‐random Reflections
resolves10.1257/aer.102.4.1279
Selective Trials: A Principal-Agent Approach to Randomized Controlled Experiments
resolves10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.05.007
A better vision for development: Eyeglasses and academic performance in rural primary schools in China
resolves10.3386/w24278
Randomizing Religion: The Impact of Protestant Evangelism on Economic Outcomes
resolves10.3386/w27569
Financing Municipal Water and Sanitation Services in Nairobi’s Informal Settlements
resolves10.3386/w8343
Vouchers for Private Schooling in Colombia: Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00539.x
Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India
resolves10.1289/ehp.02110s2145
Community involvement in the ethical review of genetic research: lessons from American Indian and Alaska Native populations.
resolves10.1073/pnas.2012021117
Ethics in field experimentation: A call to establish new standards to protect the public from unwanted manipulation and real harms
resolves10.1257/aer.104.7.2210
Household Bargaining and Excess Fertility: An Experimental Study in Zambia
resolves10.1257/aeri.20200261
Persistent Political Engagement: Social Interactions and the Dynamics of Protest Movements
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00481.x
Worms: Identifying Impacts on Education and Health in the Presence of Treatment Externalities
resolves10.1002/1529-0131(199610)9:5<400::aid-anr1790090509>3.0.co;2-i
Is consent to participate in research voluntary?
resolves10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.635
Tying Odysseus to the Mast: Evidence From a Commitment Savings Product in the Philippines
resolves10.1182/blood-2005-02-0556
Providing research results to study participants: support versus practice of researchers presenting at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting
resolves10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.02.023
It's not just what you say, it's also how you say it: Opening the ‘black box’ of informed consent appointments in randomised controlled trials
resolves10.1186/1745-6215-14-s1-o63
Recruiters to randomised trials can be trained to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients’ treatment preferences
resolves10.1073/pnas.1000776108
Being surveyed can change later behavior and related parameter estimates
The 4 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref30
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3773892"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3773892/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3773892)