Reference health
A Model of Anchoring and Adjustment for Decision-Making under Risk
89/89 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-24
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
25 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 89 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1257/aer.101.2.695
The Rich Domain of Uncertainty: Source Functions and Their Experimental Implementation
resolves10.2307/1907921
Le Comportement de l'Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l'Ecole Americaine
resolves10.2307/1881800
The Use of Unbounded Utility Functions in Expected-Utility Maximization: Response
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.014
Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns
resolves10.1257/aer.98.5.2066
Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices
resolves10.3982/ECTA16646
On the Empirical Validity of Cumulative Prospect Theory: Experimental Evidence of Rank‐Independent Probability Weighting
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1050.0404
Three New Tests of Independence That Differentiate Models of Risky Decision Making
resolves10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1485.12086
A Parameter-Free Elicitation of the Probability Weighting Function in Medical Decision Analysis
resolves10.1016/j.jet.2007.01.017
Choice under uncertainty with the best and worst in mind: Neo-additive capacities
resolves10.1007/s11166-007-9011-z
Eliciting decision weights by adapting de Finetti’s betting-odds method to prospect theory
resolves10.1002/bdm.495
When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchors
resolves10.1007/s11166-010-9090-0
Rationality on the rise: Why relative risk aversion increases with stake size
resolves10.1037/a0029346
Uncertainty plus prior equals rational bias: An intuitive Bayesian probability weighting function.
resolves10.1086/260670
On Handa's "New Theory of Cardinal Utility" and the Maximization of Expected Return
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1050.0409
Subjective Probability Assessment in Decision Analysis: Partition Dependence and Bias Toward the Ignorance Prior
resolves10.1093/qje/121.4.1283
The Uncertainty Effect: When a Risky Prospect is Valued Less than its Worst Possible Outcome
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02312.x
The Fourfold Pattern of Risk Attitudes in Choice and Pricing Tasks
resolves10.1287/orsc.2017.1149
Experiential Learning, Competitive Selection, and Downside Risk: A New Perspective on Managerial Risk Taking
resolves10.1073/pnas.2002232118
Optimal utility and probability functions for agents with finite computational precision
resolves10.1257/00028280260344452
The Returns to Entrepreneurial Investment: A Private Equity Premium Puzzle?
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0245969
Context dependency in risky decision making: Is there a description-experience gap?
resolves10.1257/jel.50.4.1080
Psychologists at the Gate: A Review of Daniel Kahneman's <i>Thinking, Fast and Slow</i>
resolves10.1037/a0021540
The effect of accuracy motivation on anchoring and adjustment: Do people adjust from provided anchors?
resolves10.1017/S0140525X00003435
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.742
Context and the interpretation of likelihood information: The role of intergroup comparisons on perceived vulnerability.
resolves10.1016/0749-5978(89)90035-6
Effects of situation familiarity and financial incentives on use of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic for probability assessment
The 25 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedInformation theory meets expected utility: The entropic roots of probability weighting functions
no DOI — not checkedWhen risk perception gets in the way: Probability weighting and underprevention
no DOI — not checkedA model of investor sentiment
no DOI — not checkedSpecimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedShould you invest in the long tail?
no DOI — not checkedCognitive biases: Mistakes or missing stakes?
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedThe dynamics of decision making in risky choice: An eye-tracking analysis
no DOI — not checkedFault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedBehavioral inattention
no DOI — not checkedProbability weighting as evolutionary second-best
no DOI — not checkedref73
no DOI — not checkedref78
no DOI — not checkedref82
no DOI — not checkedref84
no DOI — not checkedRisk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem
no DOI — not checkedref90
no DOI — not checkedImpact of consequence information on insurance choice
no DOI — not checked(Over)insuring modest risks
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-24 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3845633"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3845633/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3845633)