Reference health

A Buyer Power Theory of Exclusive Dealing and Exclusionary Bundling

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3850245
CiteStamped reference-health badge
45/45 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-22

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

26 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 45 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1257/aer.20151710
Contracts as a Barrier to Entry in Markets with Nonpivotal Buyers
resolves10.2307/2555414
Common Marketing Agency as a Device for Facilitating Collusion
resolves10.1086/250003
Exclusive Dealing
resolves10.2307/2937866
An Outside Option Experiment
resolves10.1111/1468-0297.00343
Hard Bargains and Lost Opportunities
resolves10.1016/0899-8256(91)90030-I
Do people exploit their bargaining power? An experimental study
resolves10.2307/2297815
Incomplete Contracts, Vertical Integration, and Supply Assurance
resolves10.1257/aer.103.6.2384
Competition with Exclusive Contracts and Market-Share Discounts
resolves10.1257/aer.20131664
Exclusive Contracts and Market Dominance
resolves10.1111/1756-2171.12338
The demand‐boost theory of exclusive dealing
resolves10.2307/3087430
The Strategic Use of Tying to Preserve and Create Market Power in Evolving Industries
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02481.x
Upgrades, Switching Costs and the Leverage Theory of Tying
resolves10.2307/2946711
Preemptive R&D, Rent Dissipation, and the "Leverage Theory"
resolves10.1046/j.0013-0133.2003.00178.x
Tying and Innovation: A Dynamic Analysis of Tying Arrangements
resolves10.7551/mitpress/5810.001.0001
Recent Developments in Antitrust
resolves10.2307/2696397
Tying, Investment, and the Dynamic Leverage Theory
resolves10.1111/1756-2171.12084
Nonlinear pricing and exclusion: I. buyer opportunism
resolves10.1086/700729
“Nash-in-Nash” Bargaining: A Microfoundation for Applied Work
resolves10.1093/ej/ueab024
Upstream Bundling and Leverage of Market Power
resolves10.1257/aer.96.3.785
Exclusive Dealing and Entry, when Buyers Compete
resolves10.1016/j.ijindorg.2007.11.001
An antitrust analysis of bundled loyalty discounts
resolves10.1257/aer.102.2.686
The Use of Full-Line Forcing Contracts in the Video Rental Industry
resolves10.1257/aer.20171288
Equilibrium Provider Networks: Bargaining and Exclusion in Health Care Markets
resolves10.2307/2555664
Bilateral Monopolies and Incentives for Merger
resolves10.1257/aer.20140131
Discounts as a Barrier to Entry
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02001.x
Retail Mergers, Buyer Power and Product Variety
resolves10.1086/697205
Intermediation and Resale in Networks
resolves10.2307/2556044
Predatory Accommodation: Below-Cost Pricing without Exclusion in Intermediate Goods Markets
resolves10.1016/j.ijindorg.2009.11.001
Break-up fees and bargaining power in sequential contracting
resolves10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00262.x
<scp>Slotting Allowances and Scarce Shelf Space</scp>
resolves10.1111/j.0741-6261.2007.00120.x
Downstream mergers and producer's capacity choice: why bake a larger pie when getting a smaller slice?
resolves10.1162/003355304772839551
Bundling as an Entry Barrier
resolves10.2307/1907266
The Bargaining Problem
resolves10.1016/j.jet.2018.06.003
Exclusive dealing and vertical integration in interlocking relationships
resolves10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.09.005
Bundling may blockade entry
resolves10.2307/2555997
The Role of Exclusive Territories in Producers' Competition
resolves10.1257/aer.90.1.296
Naked Exclusion: Comment
resolves10.1007/BF01766400
Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games
resolves10.2307/1913509
Involuntary Unemployment as a Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model
resolves10.4159/harvard.9780674433403
Market Structure and Behavior
resolves10.1257/aer.97.4.1305
Naked Exclusion, Efficient Breach, and Downstream Competition
resolves10.2307/2555912
On the Efficiency of Privately Stipulated Damages for Breach of Contract: Entry Barriers, Reliance, and Renegotiation
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2017.11.004
An alternating-offers model of multilateral negotiations
resolves10.1257/jep.15.2.63
Exclusivity and Tying in <i>U.S. v. Microsoft</i>: What We Know, and Don't Know
resolves10.1257/aer.99.3.1070
Exclusive Dealing and Entry, when Buyers Compete: Comment
The 26 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedContracts as a Barrier to Entry
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedGame-Theoretic Models of Bargaining
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedA Leverage Theory of Tying in Two-Sided Markets with Non-Negative Price Constraints
no DOI — not checkedLinear Demand Systems for Differentiated Goods: Overview and User's Guide
no DOI — not checkedReport on the Federal Trade Commission Workshop on Slotting Allowances and Other Marketing Practices in the Grocery Industry
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedNetwork Formation and Bargaining in Vertical Markets: The Case of Narrow Networks in Health Insurance
no DOI — not checkedAnalyzing the Welfare Impacts of Full-line Forcing Contracts
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedA General Experiment on Bargaining in Demand Games with Outside Options
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedThe Strategic Value of Quantity Forcing Contracts
no DOI — not checkedThe Competitive Effects of Vertical Agreements: Comment
no DOI — not checkedNaked Exclusion with Private Offers
no DOI — not checkedBargaining, Bundling, and Clout: The Portfolio Effects of Horizontal Mergers
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedref56
no DOI — not checkedNaked Exclusion
no DOI — not checkedThe Logic of Vertical Restraints
no DOI — not checkedEconomics of Vertical Restraints
no DOI — not checkedref61
no DOI — not checkedTying, Foreclosure, and Exclusion
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3850245"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3850245/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3850245/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3850245)