Reference health
Public Information and Capital Flows: Evidence from a Betting Market
1 of 42 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-03
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
marked retracted by the publisher10.1111/j.1475-679X.2011.00430.x
Self‐Serving Attribution Bias, Overconfidence, and the Issuance of Management Forecasts
The 41 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2019.101261
Does the media help or hurt retail investors during the IPO quiet period?
resolves10.1007/s11142-019-09499-8
Securities regulation, household equity ownership, and trust in the stock market
resolves10.1093/rof/rfn023
An Experimental Test of the Impact of Overconfidence and Gender on Trading Activity
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.02.001
The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on foreign mutual fund ownership: The role of comparability
resolves10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.399
Mandated Disclosure, Stock Returns, and the 1964 Securities Acts Amendments
resolves10.1086/262005
Differential Interpretation of Public Signals and Trade in Speculative Markets
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.03.002
Arrogance can be a virtue: Overconfidence, information acquisition, and market efficiency☆
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00078
Volume, Volatility, Price, and Profit When All Traders Are Above Average
resolves10.1080/00036840110111176
An examination of the empirical derivatives of the favourite-longshot bias in racetrack betting
resolves10.1016/0001-6918(81)90005-6
Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhq141
All the News That's Fit to Reprint: Do Investors React to Stale Information?
resolves10.1037/bul0000218
The better-than-average effect in comparative self-evaluation: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedThe better-than-average effect
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedMarket efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance
no DOI — not checkedThe Racing Times to take on a Goliath
no DOI — not checkedOn the impossibility of informationally efficient markets
no DOI — not checkedA new paper takes on Form under Crist
no DOI — not checkedRacing Times ventures onto Daily Form's turf
no DOI — not checkedHeart problem is said to have killed Maxwell
no DOI — not checkedNoise, information, and the favorite-longshot bias in parimutuel predictions
no DOI — not checkedref51
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3874155"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3874155/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3874155)