Reference health
Attitude Theories of the Law
49/49 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-06
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
64 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 49 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.612
See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception.
resolves10.1002/bsl.591
When mitigation evidence makes a difference: effects of psychological mitigating evidence on sentencing decisions in capital trials
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00408.x
Reasoning on the Threshold: Testing the Separability of Preferences in Legal Decision Making
resolves10.1002/bsl.734
The impact of death qualification, belief in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials
resolves10.5243/jsswr.2010.8
Author Guidelines for Reporting Scale Development and Validation Results in the <i>Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research</i>
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.568
Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions.
resolves10.1111/pops.12055
Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity
resolves10.4135/9781446287866
Scale Construction and Psychometrics for Social and Personality
Psychology
resolves10.1080/10478400903028573
Above and Below Left–Right: Ideological Narratives and Moral Foundations
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199711)18:6<667::AID-JOB874>3.0.CO;2-T
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: guidelines, issues, and alternatives
resolves10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_28
Cultural Cognition as a Conception of the Cultural Theory of Risk
resolves10.1037/rev0000093
Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology.
resolves10.1017/S0003055406062502
Transformations of the Concept of Ideology in the Twentieth
Century
resolves10.1007/BF01044688
Reliability and validity of the original and revised Legal Attitudes Questionnaire.
resolves10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00378.x
Individual Differences in Attitudes Relevant to Juror Decision Making: Development and Validation of the Pretrial Juror Attitude Questionnaire (PJAQ)<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1093/pan/10.2.134
Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999
resolves10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.34
A meta-analysis of the association between authoritarianism and jurors' perceptions of defendant culpability.
resolves10.3758/BF03193578
Ripple effects in memory: judgments of moral blame can distort memory for events
resolves10.1080/15377938.2016.1187233
Comparing legal attitudes of Anglo- and Latino-Americans: Confirming the factor structure of the Legal Attitudes Questionnaire
resolves10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01220.x
Attitudinal and Neo-Institutional Models of Supreme Court Decision Making: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective from Israel
resolves10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079
A Beginner’s Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis
The 64 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedIs Today's Court the Most Conservative in Sixty Years? Challenges and Opportunities in Measuring Judicial Preferences
no DOI — not checkedSimplicity
no DOI — not checkedMr. Prejudice, Miss Sympathy, and the Authoritarian Personality: An Application of Psychological Measuring Techniques to the Problem of Jury Bias Law and Society
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedThe Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedEstimating Judicial Traits from Text Analysis of Expert Evaluations
no DOI — not checkedLegal Attitudes Scale: A Factor Analytic Study
no DOI — not checkedPolitical Science and the New Legal Realism: A Case of Unfortunate Interdisciplinary Ignorance
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedJury Decision Making: The State of the Science
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedPitfalls of Empirical Studies That Attempt to Understand the Factors Affecting Appellate Decisionmaking
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedDeveloping a Positive Theory of Decisionmaking on U.S. Courts of Appeals
no DOI — not checkedFrom Judge to Justice: Social Background Theory and the Supreme Court Methodologies for Analyzing Precedent and the Roberts Court
no DOI — not checkedWays of Criticizing Public Choice: The Uses of Empiricism and Theory in Legal Scholarship
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedA Prudential Theory of Judicial Candor
no DOI — not checked61 American Psychologist 651-70
no DOI — not checkedWhose Eyes Are You Going to Believe -Scott v. Harris and the Perils of Cognitive Illiberalism
no DOI — not checkedThey Saw a Protest: Cognitive Illiberalism and the Speech-Conduct Distinction
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedThe Self-Defensive Cognition of Self-Defense
no DOI — not checkedForm and Substance in Private Law Adjudication
no DOI — not checkedref61
no DOI — not checkedReasons for Confidence
no DOI — not checkedref64
no DOI — not checkedref66
no DOI — not checkedCan't Buy Me Love: Monetary versus in-Kind Remedies
no DOI — not checkedref71
no DOI — not checkedref72
no DOI — not checkedref77
no DOI — not checkedChina's Ideological Spectrum
no DOI — not checkedref81
no DOI — not checkedref82
no DOI — not checkedref83
no DOI — not checkedref84
no DOI — not checkedref85
no DOI — not checkedUtility of Desert
no DOI — not checkedref88
no DOI — not checkedref90
no DOI — not checkedUniversals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries
no DOI — not checkedThe Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model
no DOI — not checkedref94
no DOI — not checkedJudges as Liars
no DOI — not checkedDishonest Deed, Clear Conscience: When Cheating Leads to Moral Disengagement and Motivated Forgetting
no DOI — not checkedref97
no DOI — not checkedMotivated Cognition in Legal Judgments -An Analytic Review
no DOI — not checkedThe Plasticity of Harm in the Service of Criminalization Goals
no DOI — not checkedref102
no DOI — not checkedref104
no DOI — not checkedValues: The Concept of Values
no DOI — not checkedref108
no DOI — not checkedCitizen Attitudes toward Errors in Criminal Justice: Implications of the Declining Acceptance of Blackstone's Ratio
no DOI — not checkedref111
no DOI — not checkedSubstituting Invalid Contract Terms: Theory and Empirics
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-06 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3886554"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3886554/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3886554)