Reference health
Fair Seat Allocations in Plurality Systems with Implications for Detecting Partisan Gerrymandering
16/16 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
8 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 16 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.electstud.2016.06.014
Evaluating partisan gains from Congressional gerrymandering: Using computer simulations to estimate the effect of gerrymandering in the U.S. House
resolves10.1089/elj.2015.0317
Cutting Through the Thicket: Redistricting Simulations and the Detection of Partisan Gerrymanders
resolves10.1089/elj.2016.0384
Toward a Talismanic Redistricting Tool: A Computational Method for Identifying Extreme Redistricting Plans
resolves10.1017/S000305541900056X
Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Evaluations of Partisan Fairness in District-Based Democracies
resolves10.1089/elj.2015.0358
Unfair Partisan Gerrymanders in Politics and Law: A Diagnostic Applied to Six Cases
resolves10.1017/S0008423900036817
Seats and Votes: An Application of the Cube Law to the Canadian Electoral System
resolves10.1089/elj.2016.0387
Three Practical Tests for Gerrymandering: Application to Maryland and Wisconsin
The 8 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedDistribution of Seats by Political Affiliation and Sex," and Table 9
no DOI — not checkedThe signature of gerrymandering in rucho v. common cause
no DOI — not checkedTechnology-enabled coin flips for judging partisan gerrymandering
no DOI — not checkedA measure of partisan advantage in redistricting
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref23
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3898899"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3898899/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3898899)