Reference health
Quasi-hyperbolic Present Bias: A Meta-analysis
67/67 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
32 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 67 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1120.1690
Is There One Unifying Concept of Utility?An Experimental Comparison of Utility Under Risk and Utility Over Time
resolves10.1016/j.jbef.2016.04.001
Recent developments in the experimental elicitation of time preference
resolves10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis
resolves10.3758/BF03213979
Temporal discounting and preference reversals in choice between delayed outcomes
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00311.x
Preference Reversals Due to Myopic Discounting of Delayed Reward
resolves10.1016/0023-9690(84)90030-4
Self-control and choice in humans: Effects of video game playing as a positive reinforcer
resolves10.1016/0023-9690(80)90021-1
An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans
resolves10.1136/bmj.320.7249.1574
Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses
resolves10.1007/s11166-018-9287-1
Temporal discounting of gains and losses of time: An experimental investigation
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2019.08.013
Change in time preferences: Evidence from the Great East Japan Earthquake
resolves10.1093/scan/nsq046
What is for me is not for you: brain correlates of intertemporal choice for self and other
resolves10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00257
Discounting and Digit Ratio: Low 2D:4D Predicts Patience for a Sample of Females
resolves10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103709
Do preferences and biases predict life outcomes? Evidence from education and labor market entry decisions
resolves10.1007/s10683-019-09617-y
How soon is now? Evidence of present bias from convex time budget experiments
resolves10.1162/qjec.2009.124.1.197
Learning and Visceral Temptation in Dynamic Saving Experiments<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2012.03.012
Which measures of time preference best predict outcomes: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment
resolves10.1007/s11166-016-9242-y
On the functional form of temporal discounting: An optimized adaptive test
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2354.2009.00559.x
TIME‐INCONSISTENCY AND WELFARE PROGRAM PARTICIPATION: EVIDENCE FROM THE NLSY*
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.100
How present bias forestalls energy efficiency upgrades: A study of household appliance purchases in India
resolves10.1111/ecin.12792
PREDICTING RETIREMENT SAVINGS USING SURVEY MEASURES OF EXPONENTIAL‐GROWTH BIAS AND PRESENT BIAS
resolves10.3386/w21482
The Role of Time Preferences and Exponential-Growth Bias in Retirement Savings
resolves10.3386/w21272
Time-Inconsistency and Saving: Experimental Evidence from Low-Income Tax Filers
resolves10.1080/13504851.2013.767974
Quasi-hyperbolic time preferences and their intergenerational transmission
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2017.02.014
Decision-environment effects on intertemporal financial choices: How relevant are resource-depletion models?
resolves10.1093/ajae/aau056
Simultaneous Estimation of Risk and Time Preferences among Small‐scale Cattle Farmers in West Africa
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2012.10.012
Competition as a savings incentive: A field experiment at a homeless shelter
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2016.12.004
No need for more time: Intertemporal allocation decisions under time pressure
resolves10.1016/j.physa.2014.05.015
The impact of gender and working experience on intertemporal choices
resolves10.1016/j.socec.2015.08.002
The impacts of elicitation mechanism and reward size on estimated rates of time preference
resolves10.1007/s00213-011-2521-z
Differences in delay discounting between smokers and nonsmokers remain when both rewards are delayed
resolves10.1016/j.beproc.2015.03.006
Comparing hyperbolic, delay-amount sensitivity and present-bias models of delay discounting
resolves10.1007/s11166-011-9130-4
Does nurture matter: Theory and experimental investigation on the effect of working environment on risk and time preferences
resolves10.1016/j.tourman.2015.09.019
Linking loss aversion and present bias with overspending behavior of tourists: Insights from a lab-in-the-field experiment
resolves10.1007/s10683-015-9472-x
Patience auctions: the impact of time vs. money bidding on elicited discount rates
resolves10.1016/j.eneco.2018.12.018
A large-scale test of the effects of time discounting, risk aversion, loss aversion, and present bias on household adoption of energy-efficient technologies
resolves10.1257/aer.103.1.510
Impatience and Uncertainty: Experimental Decisions Predict Adolescents' Field Behavior
resolves10.1257/aer.100.1.557
Risk and Time Preferences: Linking Experimental and Household Survey Data from Vietnam
The 32 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedA Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedStationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience
no DOI — not checkedA note on measurement of utility
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedMeta-regression analysis in economics and business
no DOI — not checkedPrescription drug use under Medicare Part D: A linear model of nonlinear budget sets
no DOI — not checkedUsing Preference Estimates to Customize Incentives: An Application to Polio Vaccination Drives in Pakistan
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedInternal and External Validity of Experimental Risk and Time Preferences
no DOI — not checkedIncome groups and long term investment
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedSophisticated and na�ve procrastination: an experimental study
no DOI — not checkedWillingness to pay to reduce future risk: a fundamental issue to invest in prevention behaviour
no DOI — not checkedref61
no DOI — not checkedDiscounting environmental goods
no DOI — not checkedref69
no DOI — not checkedref71
no DOI — not checkedref74
no DOI — not checkedCollege Better : Parimutuel Betting Markets as a Commitment Device and Monetary Incentive
no DOI — not checkedref81
no DOI — not checkedEstimating Discount Factors within a Random Utility Theoretic Framework
no DOI — not checkedExplaining the fixed cost component of discounting: The importance of students' liquidity constraints
no DOI — not checkedref87
no DOI — not checkedFlexibility or Commitment: Insights from a Reference Dependent Preferences Model
no DOI — not checkedTrust and Trustworthiness Under the Prospect Theory: A Field Experiment in Vietnam
no DOI — not checkedref98
no DOI — not checkedref99
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3909663"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3909663/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3909663)