Reference health
Qualification, Willingness, and Gender Bias in Leader Selection
33/33 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-24
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
12 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 33 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1257/aer.p20171018
Gender Differences in the Allocation of Low-Promotability Tasks: The Role of Backlash
resolves10.1257/aer.20141734
Gender Differences in Accepting and Receiving Requests for Tasks with Low Promotability
resolves10.1037/apl0000439
Motivation to lead: A meta-analysis and distal-proximal model of motivation and leadership.
resolves10.1126/science.1211180
Affirmative Action Policies Promote Women and Do Not Harm Efficiency in the Laboratory
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2016.08.002
Gender differences in reactions to feedback and willingness to compete
resolves10.1257/aer.20160080
Gender Quotas and the Crisis of the Mediocre Man: Theory and Evidence from Sweden
resolves10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research
resolves10.1257/aer.90.4.715
Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Auditions on Female Musicians
resolves10.1007/s00355-018-1124-6
Cost asymmetry and incomplete information in a volunteer’s dilemma experiment
resolves10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103777
Can simple advice eliminate the gender gap in willingness to compete?
resolves10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103390
Do quotas help women to climb the career ladder? A laboratory experiment
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1120.1602
How Costly Is Diversity? Affirmative Action in Light of Gender Differences in Competitiveness
resolves10.1037/a0036751
Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators.
resolves10.1007/s00199-006-0186-3
Leading-by-example and signaling in voluntary contribution games: an experimental study
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2011.04.007
The benefits of voluntary leadership in experimental public goods games
The 12 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedUnderstanding Gender Differences in Leadership*
no DOI — not checkedLaboratory Evidence on the Effects of Sponsorship on the Competitive Preferences of Men and Women
no DOI — not checkedGender and Willingness to Lead: Does the Gender Composition of Teams Matter?
no DOI — not checkedClaiming authority: Negotiating challenges for women leaders
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedGender Biases in Performance Evaluation: The Role of Beliefs versus Outcomes
no DOI — not checkedLeadership Selection: Can Changing the Default Break the Glass Ceiling?
no DOI — not checkedThe Gender Gap in Self-Promotion*
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedThe effect of task choice and task assignment on the gender earnings gap: An experimental study
no DOI — not checkedref45
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-24 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3917830"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3917830/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3917830)