Reference health
Behavioural Land Use Policy Studies: Past, Present, and Future
36/36 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-24
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
15 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 36 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1257/jep.31.4.73
From Proof of Concept to Scalable Policies: Challenges and Solutions, with an Application
resolves10.1016/j.socec.2020.101598
Overconfidence and (Over)Trading: The Effect of Feedback on Trading Behavior
resolves10.1080/07352166.2018.1478227
A quest for status or a desire to fit in? An examination of suburban “monster homes” as a positional good
resolves10.1016/j.trd.2016.11.020
Myopic loss aversion in the response of electric vehicle owners to the scheduling and pricing of vehicle charging
resolves10.1177/0042098017695478
Home-ownership as a social norm and positional good: Subjective wellbeing evidence from panel data
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2017.2908
On the External Validity of Social Preference Games: A Systematic Lab-Field Study
resolves10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.06.009
Understanding rural housing abandonment in China's rapid urbanization
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.02.003
The behavioralist as tax collector: Using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01015.x
Learning to Like What You Have – Explaining the Endowment Effect
resolves10.1257/aer.104.4.1417
Knowledge is (Less) Power: Experimental Evidence from Residential Energy Use
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.046
A novel framework for rural homestead land transfer under collective ownership in China
resolves10.1038/s41562-019-0795-z
What we can learn from five naturalistic field experiments that failed to shift commuter behaviour
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105513
Revealing the intentions of farmers to recultivate abandoned farmland: A case study of the Buryat Republic in Russia
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/ab1cf1
Large greenhouse gas savings due to changes in the post-Soviet food systems
resolves10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.006
The psychology of rebound effects: Explaining energy efficiency rebound behaviours with electric vehicles and building insulation in Austria
resolves10.1002/bdm.2035
A Systematic Scoping Review of the Choice Architecture Movement: Toward Understanding When and Why Nudges Work
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02501.x
Financial Literacy, Retirement Planning and Household Wealth
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.027
Three rights separation: China’s proposed rural land rights reform and four types of local trials
The 15 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedProspect theory and the decision to move or stay
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedAnchoring in Economics: A Meta-Analysis of Studies on Willingness-To-Pay and Willingness-To-Accept
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedTime Preferences and green agricultural technology adoption: Field evidence from rice farmers in China
no DOI — not checkedAn Integrative Model of Organizational Trust
no DOI — not checkedMeta-analysis of randomised controlled trials testing behavioural interventions to promote household action on climate change
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedSoviet Union's collapse led to massive drop in carbon emissions
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedCombining behavioral interventions with market forces in the implementation of land use planning in China: A theoretical framework embedded with nudge
no DOI — not checkedSubjective land ownership and the endowment effect in land markets: A case study of the farmland "three rights separation" reform in China
no DOI — not checkedref51
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-24 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3918770"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3918770/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3918770)