Reference health
Online Repositories, Search Costs and Cumulative Innovation
49/49 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
70 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 49 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1257/aer.98.4.1578
Restructuring Research: Communication Costs and the Democratization of University Innovation
resolves10.1162/rest.88.4.774
Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.011
Close to you? Bias and precision in patent-based measures of technological proximity
resolves10.1016/j.infoecopol.2012.11.002
More bits – more bucks? Measuring the impact of broadband internet on firm performance
resolves10.1177/106591290105400103
Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2015.2285
Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science
resolves10.1257/00028280260344704
R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1100.1195
The Impact of Information Technology on Academic Scientists' Productivity and Collaboration Patterns
resolves10.1093/qje/qjr035
Information Technology and Economic Change: The Impact of The Printing Press *
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1110.1505
From Wires to Partners: How the Internet Has Fostered R&D Collaborations Within Firms
resolves10.1257/aer.101.5.1933
Climbing atop the Shoulders of Giants: The Impact of Institutions on Cumulative Research
resolves10.1093/restud/rdy028
Internet and Politics: Evidence from U.K. Local Elections and Local Government Policies
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.008
Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey
resolves10.1093/qje/qjx046
Frontier Knowledge and Scientific Production: Evidence from the Collapse of International Science*
resolves10.2307/2118401
Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2019.3521
Early Disclosure of Invention and Reduced Duplication: An Empirical Test
resolves10.2307/2109992
Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations: Sources, Characteristics, and Financing
resolves10.1002/smj.3145
Reliance on science: Worldwide front‐page patent citations to scientific articles
resolves10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00013-9
The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science
resolves10.1257/jep.5.1.29
Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2011.05.008
Further simulation evidence on the performance of the Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimator
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1040.0349
Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1120.1700
Geographic Constraints on Knowledge Spillovers: Political Borders vs. Spatial Proximity
resolves10.1162/rest.88.2.383
Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from Inventor- and Examiner-added Citations
resolves10.1257/0002828053828509
Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment
resolves10.1080/10438599700000006
University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention
The 70 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedRandom sample validation (N=200) of the matching approach yields a precision of 95,4% and recall of 97
no DOI — not checkedAcquired Immuno-Deficiency Syndrome; Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Acquired;AIDS Arteritis
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedWorking Paper
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedPatents and knowledge diffusion: The effect of early disclosure
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedEffects of Copyrights on Science -Evidence from the US Book Republication Program
no DOI — not checkedFast unfolding of communities in large networks
no DOI — not checkedThe impact of open access mandates on invention
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedProtecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not)
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedThe misunderstood function of disclosure in patent law
no DOI — not checkedDigital technology adoption and knowledge flows within firms: Can the Internet overcome geographic and technological distance?
no DOI — not checkedPatent disclosure
no DOI — not checkedDisclosure and subsequent innovation: Evidence from the patent depository library program
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedDifference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedA Calculation of the Social Returns to Innovation
no DOI — not checkedLinguistic Metrics for Patent Disclosure: Evidence from University Versus Corporate Patents
no DOI — not checkedThe myth of the sole inventor
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedref63
no DOI — not checkedDisambiguation of patent inventors and assignees using high-resolution geolocation data
no DOI — not checkedOf Mice and Academics: Examining the Effect of Openness on Innovation
no DOI — not checkedDo patents disclose useful information?
no DOI — not checkedThe Failure of Public Notice in Patent Prosecution
no DOI — not checkedConcept of a technology classification for country comparisons
no DOI — not checkedref79
no DOI — not checkedScience is Shaped by Wikipedia: Evidence From a Randomized Control Trial
no DOI — not checkedTop-20 HIV/AIDS inventors vs. authors, by the end of 1996 Top-20 AIDSDB inventors Name Location ?Patents Citations Degree Centrality Montagnier
no DOI — not checkedref88
no DOI — not checkedref89
no DOI — not checkedref90
no DOI — not checkedref91
no DOI — not checkedref92
no DOI — not checkedref93
no DOI — not checkedref94
no DOI — not checkedref95
no DOI — not checkedref96
no DOI — not checkedref97
no DOI — not checkedref98
no DOI — not checkedref99
no DOI — not checkedref100
no DOI — not checkedref101
no DOI — not checkedref102
no DOI — not checkedref103
no DOI — not checkedref104
no DOI — not checkedref105
no DOI — not checkedref106
no DOI — not checkedref107
no DOI — not checkedref108
no DOI — not checkedref109
no DOI — not checkedref110
no DOI — not checkedref111
no DOI — not checkedref112
no DOI — not checkedref113
no DOI — not checkedref114
no DOI — not checkedref115
no DOI — not checkedref116
no DOI — not checkedref117
no DOI — not checkedref118
no DOI — not checkedref119
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3920449"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3920449/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3920449)