Reference health

Scientometric Assessment of Publications on Electronic Resource Management and Electronic Resource Management System during 2000-2019

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3923494
CiteStamped reference-health badge
7/7 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-04

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

15 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 7 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/s11192-010-0185-9
Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar
resolves10.1080/0361526X.2019.1551678
Electronic Resources in a Consortial Implementation of Alma and Primo
resolves10.1080/00987913.2008.10765191
Electronic Resource Management Systems (ERMS) Review
resolves10.1300/J123v47n04_12
Electronic Resources Management Systems
resolves10.1080/03615260802059965
Library Standards and E-Resource Management: A Survey of Current Initiatives and Standards Efforts
resolves10.1080/15424060902932185
Core Competencies for Electronic Resource Access Services
resolves10.1080/19411260903445883
E-Resources Management: How We Positioned Our Organization to Implement an Electronic Resources Management System
The 15 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedA comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedControlling chaos: management of electronic journal holdings in an academic library environment
no DOI — not checkedScopus reviewed and compared: The coverage and functionality of the citation database Scopus, including comparisons with Web of Science and Google Scholar
no DOI — not checkedElectronic Resource Management Systems
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedA scientometric profile of research output from Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
no DOI — not checkedElectronic resource management systems: The promise and disappointment. A report of the program presented by the ALCTS Continuing Resources Section, Acquisitions Committee
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedNASIG Core Competencies for Electronic Resources Librarians (revised
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref21
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-04 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3923494"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3923494/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3923494/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3923494)