Reference health
Intangible assets and the cross-section of stock returns
27/27 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-05
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
11 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 27 checked references that resolve
resolves10.3905/jpm.2020.1.161
Intangible Capital and the Value Factor: <i>Has Your Value Definition Just Expired?</i>
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03806.x
Evidence on the Characteristics of Cross Sectional Variation in Stock Returns
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00344
Explaining the Cross‐Section of Stock Returns in Japan: Factors or Characteristics?
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00644.x
An Examination of Long‐Term Abnormal Stock Returns and Operating Performance Following R&D Increases
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.09.008
Product market competition, R&D investment, and stock returns
resolves10.1111/j.0306-686X.2005.00644.x
Intangible Assets, Information Complexity, and Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts
resolves10.3386/w14548
What is a Company Really Worth? Intangible Capital and the "Market to Book Value" Puzzle
resolves10.1016/0165-4101(95)00410-6
The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D
resolves10.1007/s11142-012-9188-5
Evidence on the use of unverifiable estimates in required goodwill impairment
The 11 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedIntangible Value, Working Paper Eisfeldt, A. and D. Papanikolaou, 2013, Organization capital and the cross-section of expected returns
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedExplaining the recent failure of value investing, Working Paper Palmon, D. and A. Yezegel, 2012, R&D intensity and the value of analysts' recommendations
no DOI — not checkedAn Intangible-adjusted Book-to-price Ratio Still Predicts Stock Returns
no DOI — not checkedIntangible intensity and stock price crash risk
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-05 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3927990"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3927990/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3927990)