Reference health

Digital Platforms and the Transactions Cost Approach to Competition Law

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3934925
CiteStamped reference-health badge
7/7 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-29

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

46 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 7 checked references that resolve
resolves10.3917/redp.292.0261
Exploitative Abuse and Abuse of Economic Dependence: What Can We Learn From an Industrial Organization Approach?
resolves10.1093/icc/dtl008
Transaction cost economics, resource dependence theory, and customer-supplier relationships
resolves10.1002/smj.2904
Towards a theory of ecosystems
resolves10.1093/jleo/7.special_issue.53
The Role of Transaction Cost Economics in Antitrust and Public Utility Regulatory Policies
resolves10.1017/CBO9781139174589
Regulations, Institutions, and Commitment
resolves10.1177/0003603X19898626
Competition Law as a Form of Social Regulation
resolves10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy
The 46 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAustralian Competition and Consumer Commission
no DOI — not checkedAntitrust, competition policy, and inequality
no DOI — not checkedIs protecting sunk investments by consumers a key rationale for natural monopoly regulation?
no DOI — not checkedFairness in public-utility regulation: a theory
no DOI — not checkedWhy regulate airports? a re-examination of the rationale for airport regulation
no DOI — not checkedThe goals of competition law debate and competition policy for labor markets
no DOI — not checkedIs protecting sunk investments an economic rationale for antitrust law?
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedAntitrust and wealth inequality
no DOI — not checkedCan self-regulation save digital platforms
no DOI — not checkedAntitrust in retrograde: The consumer welfare standard, sociopolitical goals, and the future of enforcement
no DOI — not checkedUnlocking digital competition: Report of the digital competition expert panel
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedWelfare standards and merger analysis: Why not the best?
no DOI — not checkedBenefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures
no DOI — not checkedEcosystems and competition law in theory and practice
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedAmazon's antitrust paradox
no DOI — not checkedThe separation of platforms and commerce
no DOI — not checkedMarket power and inequality: The antitrust counterrevolution and its discontents
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedThe fundamental goal of antitrust: Protecting consumers, not increasing efficiency
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedThe institutional foundations of regulatory commitment: a comparative analysis of telecommunications regulation
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedPlatform mergers and antitrust
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedAftermarkets and consumer welfare: Making sense of kodak
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedTowards a broader view of competition policy
no DOI — not checkedInnovation, governance, and capabilities: implications for competition policy
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedref53
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-29 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3934925"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3934925/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3934925/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3934925)