Reference health
Effects of Peer Groups on the Gender-Wage Gap and Life After the MBA: Evidence from the Random Assignment of MBA Peers
38/38 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
30 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 38 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1198/016214502753479419
Bootstrap Tests for Distributional Treatment Effects in Instrumental Variable Models
resolves10.1111/ecoj.12556
The Effects of High School Peers’ Gender on College Major, College Performance and Income
resolves10.1086/723500
Career Consequences of Firm Heterogeneity for Young Workers: First Job and Firm Size
resolves10.1093/qje/qjad017
Gender Differences in Job Search and the Earnings Gap: Evidence from the Field and Lab
resolves10.1177/00197939211045376
The Return to Hours Worked within and across Occupations: Implications for the Gender Wage Gap
resolves10.1086/689472
Understanding Peer Effects: On the Nature, Estimation, and Channels of Peer Effects
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2022.01.012
The effect of higher-achieving peers on major choices and labor market outcomes
resolves10.1257/000282806777212350
The Quiet Revolution That Transformed Women's Employment, Education, and Family
resolves10.1257/jep.20.4.133
The Homecoming of American College Women: The Reversal of the College Gender Gap
resolves10.1016/j.labeco.2009.09.002
The long-term labor market consequences of graduating from college in a bad economy
resolves10.1016/j.labeco.2017.01.005
The positive influence of female college students on their male peers
resolves10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.11.002
Gender peer effects in university: Evidence from a randomized experiment
resolves10.1086/260169
Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition
resolves10.1162/00335530151144131
Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results for Dartmouth Roommates
resolves10.1086/701046
Unlucky Cohorts: Estimating the Long-Term Effects of Entering the Labor Market in a Recession in Large Cross-Sectional Data Sets
resolves10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.11.002
Girls, girls, girls: Gender composition and female school choice
resolves10.1093/rfs/hht019
Executive Networks and Firm Policies: Evidence from the Random Assignment of MBA Peers
resolves10.1162/003465303762687677
Peer Effects in Academic Outcomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
The 30 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedInteractions with Powerful Female Colleagues Promote Diversity in Hiring
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedNew Perspectives on Gender
no DOI — not checkedDynamics of the Gender Gap for Young Professionals in the Financial and Corporate Sectors
no DOI — not checkedNevertheless She Persisted? Gender Peer Eects in Doctoral STEM Programs
no DOI — not checkedWhy Do Women Earn Less Than Men? Evidence from Bus and Train Operators
no DOI — not checkedPerformative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedMatching in the Dark? Inequalities in Student to Degree Match
no DOI — not checkedThe Impact of College Diversity on Behavior toward Minorities
no DOI — not checkedThe asymmetric gender eects of high yers
no DOI — not checkedTesting and Relaxing the Exclusion Restriction in the Control Function Approach
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedAcademic Peer Eects with Dierent Group Assignment Policies: Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedPeer Eects in the Workplace: Evidence from Random Groupings in Professional Golf Tournaments
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedHigh-Performing Peers and Female STEM Choices in School
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedPreference for the Workplace, Investment in Human Capital, and Gender
no DOI — not checkedTable XII Eect of Coursework and Concentration on Oers for Expected Future Wages Conditional on Initial Industry and Job Function at Graduation Job Function Averages 10 Years Out Industry Averages 10 Years Out
no DOI — not checkedref68
no DOI — not checkedref69
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3968529"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3968529/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3968529)