Reference health
Inequality and the Environment: The Economics of a Two-Headed Hydra
198/198 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-16
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
55 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 198 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1086/705551
Cutthroat Capitalism versus Cuddly Socialism: Are Americans More Meritocratic and Efficiency-Seeking than Scandinavians?
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2010.04.002
On international equity weights and national decision making on climate change
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.017
Equity weighting and the marginal damage costs of climate change
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.097
Does income inequality harm the environment?: Empirical evidence from the United States
resolves10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00026-1
The Ambiguous Impact of Inequality on Local Resource Management
resolves10.1257/aer.98.3.843
Do People Vote with Their Feet? An Empirical Test of Tiebout's Mechanism
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2017.04.005
Income inequality and willingness to pay for environmental public goods
resolves10.1080/00220485.2020.1804511
Expanding and diversifying the pool of undergraduates who study economics: Insights from a new introductory course at Harvard
resolves10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.04.005
Carbon tax and revenue recycling: Impacts on households in British Columbia
resolves10.1162/REST_a_00493
Who Benefits from Environmental Regulation? Evidence from the Clean Air Act Amendments
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2018.09.021
The distributional effects of a carbon tax and its impact on fuel poverty: A microsimulation study in the French context
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.026
Mechanisms explaining the impact of economic inequality on environmental deterioration
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/aac3ec
Targeted policies can compensate most of the increased sustainability risks in 1.5 °C mitigation scenarios
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01042.x
Emulation, Inequality, and Work Hours: Was Thorsten Veblen Right?
resolves10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00056-1
Power distribution, the environment, and public health: A state-level analysis
resolves10.1017/S1355770X13000284
Climate policy and equity principles: fair burden sharing in a dynamic world
resolves10.1006/jeem.1996.0967
The Distribution of Pollution: Community Characteristics and Exposure to Air Toxics
resolves10.1093/jeg/lbaa005
Impact of air pollution on short-term movements: evidence from air travels in China
resolves10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.12.006
From regressive pollution taxes to progressive environmental tax reforms
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.001
Carbon dioxide emission and income: A temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.014
A household level environmental Kuznets curve? Some recent evidence on transport emissions and income
resolves10.1146/annurev-resource-100913-012610
What Do We Know About Short- and Long-Term Effects of Early-Life Exposure to Pollution?
resolves10.3386/w26659
What Caused Racial Disparities in Particulate Exposure to Fall? New Evidence from the Clean Air Act and Satellite-Based Measures of Air Quality
resolves10.1162/REST_a_00680
Who Loses under Cap-and-Trade Programs? The Labor Market Effects of the NO<sub>x</sub> Budget Trading Program
resolves10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122646
The Haves, the Have-Nots, and the Health of Everyone: The Relationship Between Social Inequality and Environmental Quality
resolves10.1007/s10640-010-9366-5
Do Equity Preferences Matter for Climate Negotiators? An Experimental Investigation
resolves10.1016/S1574-0110(02)80014-5
Chapter 10 Social welfare functionals and interpersonal comparability
resolves10.1111/1468-0297.00731
Inequality and Conservation on the Local Commons: A Theoretical Exercise
resolves10.21642/JGEA.050101AF
Shaping baseline scenarios of economic activity with CGE models: introduction to the special issue
resolves10.1086/682716
White Flight and Coming to the Nuisance: Can Residential Mobility Explain Environmental Injustice?
resolves10.1257/aer.20131002
Defensive Investments and the Demand for Air Quality: Evidence from the NOx Budget Program
resolves10.3368/le.86.3.423
The Equity-Efficiency Trade-off in Environmental Policy: Evidence from Stated Preferences
resolves10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.11.015
Poverty and distributional effects of carbon pricing in low- and middle-income countries – A global comparative analysis
resolves10.1080/09644016.2019.1659576
Building and enhancing climate policy ambition with transfers: allowance allocation and revenue spending in the EU ETS
resolves10.5547/01956574.41.3.tdou
The Vertical and Horizontal Distributive Effects of Energy Taxes: A Case Study of a French Policy
resolves10.1007/s10640-016-0068-5
Limits to Substitution Between Ecosystem Services and Manufactured Goods and Implications for Social Discounting
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.011
Ecological footprint inequality across countries: The role of environment intensity, income and interaction effects
resolves10.1023/A:1026420425961
The Aggregation of Climate Change Damages: a Welfare Theoretic Approach
resolves10.2139/ssrn.3703833
Understanding Regressivity: Challenges and Opportunities of European Carbon Pricing
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.04.003
The role of uncertainty and learning for the success of international climate agreements
resolves10.1093/reep/rew003
The Use of Distributional Weights in Benefit–Cost Analysis: Insights from Welfare Economics
resolves10.1093/reep/reu002
Long-Run Demand for Energy Services: Income and Price Elasticities over Two Hundred Years
resolves10.1257/aer.102.2.965
What Do Emissions Markets Deliver and to Whom? Evidence from Southern California's NO<sub>x</sub> Trading Program
resolves10.1016/j.eap.2015.01.004
The burden of Germany’s energy transition: An empirical analysis of distributional effects
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2012.12.001
Does cleanup of hazardous waste sites raise housing values? Evidence of spatially localized benefits
resolves10.2307/1883195
The Distributional Effects of Uniform Air Pollution Policy in the United States
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.04.002
Impacts of a carbon tax across US household income groups: What are the equity-efficiency trade-offs?
resolves10.1257/aer.101.3.448
Water Quality Violations and Avoidance Behavior: Evidence from Bottled Water Consumption
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.06.006
The distributional effects of pollution regulations: Do renters fully pay for cleaner air?
resolves10.1086/684132
Distributional Effects of the Transition to Property Rights for a Common-Pool Resource
resolves10.1162/qjec.2008.123.3.951
Does Hazardous Waste Matter? Evidence from the Housing Market and the Superfund Program<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.10.004
The effect of pollution on labor supply: Evidence from a natural experiment in Mexico City
resolves10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00171-9
Income inequality and the environment: aggregation bias in environmental Kuznets curves
resolves10.3197/096327101129340714
Distributive Justice in International Environmental Policy: Axiomatic Foundation and Exemplary Formulation
resolves10.3386/w27205
Do Environmental Markets Cause Environmental Injustice? Evidence from California's Carbon Market
resolves10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01207.x
A Cross‐National Analysis of How Economic Inequality Predicts Biodiversity Loss
resolves10.1257/0002828042002705
Running to Keep in the Same Place: Consumer Choice as a Game of Status
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2015.01.003
Pigou meets Mirrlees: On the irrelevance of tax distortions for the second-best Pigouvian tax
resolves10.1007/s10640-008-9226-8
Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation?
resolves10.1080/14693062.2018.1502145
Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.099
Does inequality affect environmental quality? Evidence from major Japanese cities
resolves10.1016/S0140-9883(99)00043-2
Gasoline demand and car choice: estimating gasoline demand using household information
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2014.04.024
The impact of burden sharing rules on the voluntary provision of public goods
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2015.11.019
How to make a carbon tax reform progressive: The role of subsistence consumption
resolves10.1007/s10640-016-0070-y
Environmental Taxation, Inequality and Engel’s Law: The Double Dividend of Redistribution
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2015.05.010
The European renewable energy target for 2030 – An impact assessment of the electricity sector
resolves10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00044-0
Cooperation in international environmental negotiations due to a preference for equity
resolves10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.08.006
On the self-interested use of equity in international climate negotiations
resolves10.1016/j.eneco.2006.09.002
On the importance of equity in international climate policy: An empirical analysis
resolves10.1086/701186
Energy Efficiency Standards Are More Regressive Than Energy Taxes: Theory and Evidence
resolves10.1017/S1355770X05002755
The distributional impact of climate change on rich and poor countries
resolves10.1007/s10784-017-9378-5
How empirical uncertainties influence the stability of climate coalitions
resolves10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.10.007
Fuel for inequality: Distributional effects of environmental reforms on private transport
resolves10.1007/s10584-011-0319-y
Cooperative interaction of rich and poor can be catalyzed by intermediate climate targets
resolves10.1353/jhr.2011.0012
Pollution, Health, and Avoidance Behavior: Evidence from the Ports of Los Angeles
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104259
Can access to health care mitigate the effects of temperature on mortality?
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.011
British Columbia’s revenue-neutral carbon tax: A review of the latest “grand experiment” in environmental policy
resolves10.5547/2160-5890.2.1.3
Distributional Effects of Energy Transition: Impacts of Renewable Electricity Support in Germany
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.021
Distributional Weights in Environmental Valuation and Cost-benefit Analysis: Theory and Practice
resolves10.1126/science.1172133
A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
resolves10.1038/s41560-020-0579-8
Large inequality in international and intranational energy footprints between income groups and across consumption categories
resolves10.1017/S1355770X1800013X
Households and heat stress: estimating the distributional consequences of climate change
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.04.004
Household heterogeneity, aggregation, and the distributional impacts of environmental taxes
resolves10.1016/j.eneco.2011.07.023
Distributional impacts of carbon pricing: A general equilibrium approach with micro-data for households
resolves10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104507
Income inequality and carbon consumption: Evidence from Environmental Engel curves
resolves10.1177/0361198105192400113
Distributional Consequences of Gasoline Taxation in the United Kingdom
resolves10.1073/pnas.0906865106
Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change
resolves10.1080/14693062.2006.9685588
CO
<sub>2</sub>
cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106374
The worth of wildlife: A meta-analysis of global non-market values of threatened species
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.030
Self-protection investment exacerbates air pollution exposure inequality in urban China
resolves10.1073/pnas.1102493108
Inequality, communication, and the avoidance of disastrous climate change in a public goods game
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.041
International inequality of environmental pressures: Decomposition and comparative analysis
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2004.01.016
The welfare effects and the distributive impact of carbon taxation on Italian households
resolves10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00010-5
Welfare specifications and optimal control of climate change: an application of fund
resolves10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00177-8
Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets Curve
resolves10.1038/s41893-019-0385-0
Cash transfers for pro-poor carbon taxes in Latin America and the Caribbean
resolves10.1093/qje/qjt022
The Transitional Costs of Sectoral Reallocation: Evidence From the Clean Air Act and the Workforce*
resolves10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00186-X
Distributional effects of alternative vehicle pollution control policies
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2003.11.004
Estimates from a consumer demand system: implications for the incidence of environmental taxes
resolves10.2753/JEI0021-3624450407
Inequality, Social Respectability, Political Power, and Environmental Devastation
resolves10.1007/s10640-018-0282-4
Intergenerational Discounting with Intragenerational Inequality in Consumption and the Environment
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2017.07.006
Air pollution and defensive expenditures: Evidence from particulate-filtering facemasks
resolves10.1016/j.jet.2011.08.001
Justifying social discounting: The rank-discounted utilitarian approach
The 55 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedCarbon taxes and CO2 emissions: Sweden as a case study
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedImproving Public Good Supply and Income Equality: Facing a Trade-Off
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedThe effect of pollution on worker productivity: evidence from call center workers in China
no DOI — not checkedParticulate pollution and the productivity of pear packers
no DOI — not checkedSorting or steering: Experimental evidence on the economic effects of housing discrimination
no DOI — not checkedHousing Discrimination and Pollution Exposures in the US
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedThe Grandkids Aren't Alright: The Intergenerational Effects of Prenatal Pollution Exposure
no DOI — not checkedref69
no DOI — not checkedref73
no DOI — not checkedref79
no DOI — not checkedRelative prices and climate policy: How the scarcity of non-market goods drives policy evaluation
no DOI — not checkedref88
no DOI — not checkedThe long-run economic consequences of highstakes examinations: Evidence from transitory variation in pollution
no DOI — not checkedFair social ordering, egalitarianism, and animal welfare
no DOI — not checkedref104
no DOI — not checkedEnergy cost pass-through in US manufacturing: Estimates and implications for carbon taxes
no DOI — not checkedCan social protection reduce environmental damages?
no DOI — not checkedref119
no DOI — not checkedref128
no DOI — not checkedSevere air pollution and labor productivity: Evidence from industrial towns in China
no DOI — not checkedEast side story: Historical pollution and persistent neighborhood sorting
no DOI — not checkedref142
no DOI — not checkedref149
no DOI — not checkedDoes environmental policy affect income inequality? Evidence from the Clean Air Act
no DOI — not checkedref160
no DOI — not checkedThe social cost of carbon and inequality: When local redistribution shapes global carbon prices
no DOI — not checkedRegressivity in environmental taxation: myth or reality?
no DOI — not checkedref167
no DOI — not checkedref168
no DOI — not checkedref172
no DOI — not checkedGasoline Taxes and Consumer Behavior
no DOI — not checkedOn the measurement of environmental inequality: Ranking emissions distributions generated by different policy instruments. Forthcoming
no DOI — not checkedInequality and the value of public natural capital
no DOI — not checkedA regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies
no DOI — not checkedOne reason why environmental valuation is controversial
no DOI — not checkedref197
no DOI — not checkedHeat and learning
no DOI — not checkedref204
no DOI — not checkedDistributional implications of alternative US greenhouse gas control measures
no DOI — not checkedref216
no DOI — not checkedref221
no DOI — not checkedref222
no DOI — not checkedref227
no DOI — not checkedref235
no DOI — not checkedref238
no DOI — not checkedSocial discounting, inequality aversion, and the environment
no DOI — not checkedref247
no DOI — not checkedref249
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-16 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3979352"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3979352/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3979352)