Reference health
Is My Partner Committed to Me or Tempted by Others?: Perceptions of the Partner's Devaluation of Alternatives
47/47 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 47 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1045
Relationship perceptions and persistence: Do fluctuations in perceived partner commitment undermine dating relationships?
resolves10.1177/0146167299025002003
Resisting Temptation Revisited: Devaluation Versus Enhancement of an Attractive Suitor by Exclusive and Nonexclusive Daters
resolves10.1017/9781108645836.015
A New Measure of Expected Relationship Satisfaction, Alternatives, and Investment Supports an Expectations Model of Interdependence
resolves10.1037/xge0000299
Expectations for future relationship satisfaction: Unique sources and critical implications for commitment.
resolves10.1037/fam0000578
Look but don't touch?: Self-regulation determines whether noticing attractive alternatives increases infidelity.
resolves10.3758/BF03193146
G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences
resolves10.1111/pere.12203
Attachment, trust, and satisfaction in relationships: Investigating actor, partner, and mediating effects
resolves10.1037/pspi0000139
How interdependent are stay/leave decisions? On staying in the relationship for the sake of the romantic partner.
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.967
Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships.
resolves10.1016/0022-1031(89)90010-3
Influence of popular erotica on judgments of strangers and mates
resolves10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01285.x
Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.647
How the head liberates the heart: Projection of communal responsiveness guides relationship promotion.
resolves10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00283.x
How to Forego Forbidden Fruit: The Regulation of Attractive Alternatives as a Commitment Mechanism
resolves10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.011
Relationship regulation in the face of eye candy: a motivated cognition framework for understanding responses to attractive alternatives
resolves10.1177/0146167299025002002
The Commitment Calibration Hypothesis: When Do People Devalue Attractive Alternatives?
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.50
If-then contingencies and the differential effects of the availability of an attractive alternative on relationship maintenance for men and women.
resolves10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5
The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.002
The implicit cognition of relationship maintenance: Inattention to attractive alternatives
resolves10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.02.003
Highlighting the Contextual Nature of Interpersonal Relationships
resolves10.1037/pspi0000127
Attentional and evaluative biases help people maintain relationships by avoiding infidelity.
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.758
Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives.
resolves10.1177/0265407508096700
Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity
resolves10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641
Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships.
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.556
When rejection stings: How self-esteem constrains relationship-enhancement processes.
resolves10.1037/a0034371
Attachment anxiety and reactions to relationship threat: The benefits and costs of inducing guilt in romantic partners.
resolves10.1177/0192513X10385788
The Revised Commitment Inventory: Psychometrics and Use With Unmarried Couples
resolves10.1037/a0021008
Should I stay or should I go? Predicting dating relationship stability from four aspects of commitment.
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0174350
The “I” in us, or the eye on us? Regulatory focus, commitment and derogation of an attractive alternative person
resolves10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4
Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101
A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements.
resolves10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.629
When the head protects the heart: Empathic accuracy in dating relationships.
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.754
When accuracy hurts: Reactions of anxious–ambivalent dating partners to a relationship-threatening situation.
resolves10.1177/0146167219841633
Seeking and Ensuring Interdependence: Desiring Commitment and the Strategic Initiation and Maintenance of Close Relationships
resolves10.1111/pere.12035
Romantic relationship status biases the processing of an attractive alternative's behavior
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAn interdependence theory analysis of close relationships
no DOI — not checkedThe changing tides of attractive alternatives in romantic relationships: Recent societal changes compel new directions for future research
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedThe wandering eye perceives more threats: Projection of attraction to alternative partners predicts anger and negative behavior in romantic relationships
no DOI — not checkedPartner commitment moderates the association between commitment and interest in romantic alternatives
no DOI — not checkedTrust and communicated attributions in close relationships
no DOI — not checkedCommitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms
no DOI — not checkedFoundations of interpersonal trust
no DOI — not checkedref52
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3991598"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3991598/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3991598)