Reference health
A Stochastic Dynamic Optimization Approach for Understanding Expected Land Use Changes to Meet Potential Water Quality Regulations: A Case Study from Georgia, United States
48/48 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
30 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 48 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.014
Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT
resolves10.1002/hyp.5611
SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling
resolves10.1007/s00267-008-9111-9
Assessment of Economic and Water Quality Impacts of Land Use Change Using a Simple Bioeconomic Model
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.107
The effect of forest windrowing on physico-chemical water quality in Ireland
resolves10.1016/j.foreco.2015.10.025
Effectiveness of forestry best management practices in the United States: Literature review
resolves10.1016/j.foreco.2017.07.002
National status of state developed and implemented forestry best management practices for protecting water quality in the United States
resolves10.2134/jeq2007.0163
Fate and Transport of Pesticides in the Ground Water Systems of Southwest Georgia, 1993–2005
resolves10.3390/agronomy10091250
Method of Tillage with the Factor Determining the Quality of Organic Matter
resolves10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.016
Effects of the sustainable forestry initiative fiber sourcing standard on the average implementation rate of forestry best management practices in Georgia, United States
resolves10.1029/WR023i012p02227
Stochastic water quality optimization using imbedded chance constraints
resolves10.2134/jeq2010.0411
Runoff Water Quality during Drought in a Zero‐Order Georgia Piedmont Pasture: Nitrogen and Total Organic Carbon
resolves10.2489/jswc.74.6.594
Runoff and Nutrient Losses from Conventional and Conservation Tillage Systems During Fixed and Variable Rate Rainfall Simulation
resolves10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00270-4
The relationship of land use practices to surface water quality in the Upper Oconee Watershed of Georgia
resolves10.1007/s11269-013-0503-0
Spatial Optimization of Best Management Practices to Attain Water Quality Targets
resolves10.1016/j.catena.2017.04.010
Impacts of alternative climate information on hydrologic processes with SWAT: A comparison of NCDC, PRISM and NEXRAD datasets
resolves10.1017/S1074070800020782
An Economic, Hydrologic, and Environmental Assessment of Water Management Alternative Plans for the South Central Texas Region
resolves10.1016/j.foreco.2017.06.011
Water quality effects of short-rotation pine management for bioenergy feedstocks in the southeastern United States
resolves10.1016/j.forpol.2004.04.004
Probability models for predicting local water quality regulations in the southern United States
resolves10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.032
Modeling effects of changing land use/cover on daily streamflow: An Artificial Neural Network and curve number based hybrid approach
resolves10.1111/1752-1688.12567
Water Quality Signals from Rural Land Use and Exurbanization in a Mountain Landscape: What's Clear and What's Confounded?
resolves10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1997)123:3(163)
Chance Constrained Model for Storm-Water System Design and Rehabilitation
resolves10.1007/s00267-008-9202-7
An Auxiliary Method to Reduce Potential Adverse Impacts of Projected Land Developments: Subwatershed Prioritization
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.11.019
Nitrate contamination in private wells in rural Alabama, United States
resolves10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:4(347)
Inexact Chance-Constrained Linear Programming Model for Optimal Water Pollution Management at the Watershed Scale
resolves10.1016/j.jconhyd.2013.07.004
Logistic regression modeling to assess groundwater vulnerability to contamination in Hawaii, USA
resolves10.2489/jswc.75.3.376
Element losses from fields in conventional and conservation tillage in the Atlantic Coastal Plain, Georgia, United States
resolves10.2489/jswc.72.5.519
Soil nitrogen dynamics and leaching under conservation tillage in the Atlantic Coastal Plain, Georgia, United States
resolves10.1111/1752-1688.12484
PRISM <i>vs</i>. <scp>CFSR</scp> Precipitation Data Effects on Calibration and Validation of SWAT Models
resolves10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01065.x
CONCENTRATED FLOW BREAKTHROUGHS MOVING THROUGH SILVICULTURAL STREAMSIDE MANAGEMENT ZONES: SOUTHEASTERN PIEDMONT, USA<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1016/j.foreco.2010.09.037
Phosphorus release from forest harvesting on an upland blanket peat catchment
resolves10.1144/1470-9236/07-025
Identifying the significant factors that influence temporal and spatial trends in nitrate concentrations in the Dorset and Hampshire Basin Chalk aquifer of Southern England
resolves10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:4(270)
Unit Response Approach for Priority Determination of Flood Source Areas
resolves10.1016/j.agwat.2005.11.009
Optimal crop planning and water resources allocation in a coastal groundwater basin, Orissa, India
resolves10.2166/nh.2015.222
Post-validation of SWAT model in a coastal watershed for predicting land use/cover change impacts
resolves10.2489/jswc.70.3.170
Effect of conservation practices on soil carbon and nitrogen accretion and crop yield in a corn production system in the southeastern coastal plain, United States
resolves10.1007/s00267-011-9738-9
Spatial Variations in the Relationships between Land Use and Water Quality across an Urbanization Gradient in the Watersheds of Northern Georgia, USA
resolves10.1080/1943815X.2011.577076
Spatial and temporal relationships between water quality and land use in northern Georgia, USA
resolves10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000492
Inexact Probabilistic Optimization Model and Its Application to Flood Diversion Planning in a Dynamic and Uncertain Environment
resolves10.3390/su11010033
Robust Linear Programming and Its Application to Water and Environmental Decision-Making under Uncertainty
The 30 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedAtlanta Regional Commission Open Data and Mapping Group
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedAn Empirical Investigation of Institutional Change in Groundwater Management in Texas: The Edwards Aquifer Case
no DOI — not checkedModeling Potential Erosion Differences of Small Tributaries in Managed Stands in The Bankhead National Forest, Alabama
no DOI — not checkedStream discharge database
no DOI — not checkedElevation Dependent Management of the Edwards Aquifer: Linked Mathematical and Dynamic Programming Approach
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedEnvironmental Protection Division
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedCharacteristics of selected upland soils of the Georgia Coastal Plain
no DOI — not checkedWater Quality: Timber Harvesting
no DOI — not checkedRobust optimization for total maximum daily load allocations
no DOI — not checkedUse of the consumption discount rate for public policy over the distant future
no DOI — not checkedCosts and trends for Southern forestry practices
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedIdentifying areas sensitive to land use/land cover change for downstream flooding in a coastal Alabama watershed
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedref66
no DOI — not checkedref69
no DOI — not checkedUSDA National Agricultural Statistics Service
no DOI — not checkedref71
no DOI — not checkedref73
no DOI — not checkedref75
no DOI — not checkedref76
no DOI — not checkedModeling the relationship between land use and surface water quality
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3994185"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3994185/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3994185)