Reference health
Blockchain in the energy sector. An analysis of the Brooklyn case.
30/30 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-07
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
39 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 30 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.014
Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities
resolves10.3390/en13092279
A Smart Hybrid Energy System Grid for Energy Efficiency in Remote Areas for the Army
resolves10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284
Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance
resolves10.1016/B978-0-12-817862-1.00002-6
A panorama of applications of blockchain technology to energy
resolves10.1109/Cybermatics_2018.2018.00250
A Quantifiable Trust Model for Blockchain-Based Identity Management
resolves10.1007/978-3-319-59529-0
Stochastic Optimization for Distributed Energy Resources in Smart Grids
resolves10.1016/j.tej.2018.10.003
Five things regulators should know about blockchain (and three myths to forget)
resolves10.4337/relp.2019.02.02
Investing in a Renewable Future – Renewable Energy Communities, Consumer (Co-)Ownership and Energy Sharing in the Clean Energy Package
resolves10.1016/j.rser.2019.109489
Renewable energy communities under the 2019 European Clean Energy Package – Governance model for the energy clusters of the future?
resolves10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.179
Interactive energy management of networked microgrids-based active distribution system considering large-scale integration of renewable energy resources
resolves10.1007/s13369-020-04950-4
Blockchain for COVID-19: Review, Opportunities, and a Trusted Tracking System
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.035
Delivering energy efficiency and carbon reduction schemes in England: Lessons from Green Deal Pioneer Places
resolves10.1109/TPDS.2021.3049915
On Consortium Blockchain Consistency: A Queueing Network Model Approach
resolves10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.007
Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing
resolves10.1080/10580530.2020.1720046
Defining Blockchain Governance: A Framework for Analysis and Comparison
resolves10.3390/en10121971
A Novel Electricity Transaction Mode of Microgrids Based on Blockchain and Continuous Double Auction
resolves10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.064
Enhancing smart grid with microgrids: Challenges and opportunities
The 39 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBetween the 2018 Crypto Winter and the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic, blockchain adoption and revenues drop dramatically
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedA cognitive approach to the decision to trust or distrust phishing emails
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedThe assessment of lifestyle changes during the COVID-19 pandemic using a multidimensional scale
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedHow will Blockchain change corporate governance
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedUse Case on Tendermint
no DOI — not checkedBlockchain and the General Data Protection Regulation. Can distributed ledgers be squared with European data protection law?
no DOI — not checkedMacroeconomic effects of Prosumer Households in Germany
no DOI — not checkedBlockchain. Powering the Internet of Value
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedEnergy Management in Microgrids with Renewable Energy Sources: A Literature Review
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedMicrogrids-Large Scale Integration of Microgeneration to Low Voltage Grids
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedThe Blockchain Phenomenon. The Disruptive Potential of Distributed Consensus Architectures
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedBlockchain-Technologie in der Energiewirtschaft
no DOI — not checkedMarket-based self-organized provision of active power and ancillary services: An agent-based approach for Smart Distribution Grids
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedEmissions by Sector
no DOI — not checkedProsumage of Solar Electricity: Pros, Cons, and the System Perspective
no DOI — not checkedref56
no DOI — not checkedEine Einf�hrung in die Distributed Ledger Technology (Blockchain -'Like a Locked Train
no DOI — not checkedBlockchain Revolution. How the Technology behind Bitcoin is Changing Money
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedref63
no DOI — not checkedref68
no DOI — not checkedMicrogrid Transactive Energy-Review, Architectures, Distributed Ledger Technologies, and Market Analysis
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-07 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3998651"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3998651/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3998651)