Reference health
‘Leaking’ Female Doctorates in the U.S. Stem Academy: A Review and Thematic Synthesis
29/29 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
8 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 29 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1080/19407882.2018.1501582
“I Want to be Both, but Is that Possible?”: Communicating Mother-Scholar Uncertainty During Doctoral Candidacy
resolves10.1521/scpq.19.4.327.53504
The Perceptions of Academic Women in School Psychology: A National Survey.
resolves10.3138/jcfs.41.1.1
Choices or Constraints? Family Responsibilities, Gender and Academic Career
resolves10.1257/000282805774670149
Do Faculty Serve as Role Models? The Impact of Instructor Gender on Female Students
resolves10.1111/gwao.12549
Everyday sexism and racism in the ivory tower: The experiences of early career researchers on the intersection of gender and ethnicity in the academic workplace
resolves10.1080/13668803.2013.820097
Gendered institutional research cultures in science: the post-doc transition for women scientists
resolves10.1080/1047840X.2011.620935
When Do Female Role Models Benefit Women? The Importance of Differentiating Recruitment From Retention in STEM
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0051332
The Possible Role of Resource Requirements and Academic Career-Choice Risk on Gender Differences in Publication Rate and Impact
resolves10.1177/0306312705046630
Gender, Family Characteristics, and Publication Productivity among Scientists
resolves10.1515/1940-7890.1079
"I Couldn't Wait to Leave the Toxic Environment": A Mixed Methods Study of Women Faculty Satisfaction and Departure From One Research Institution
resolves10.21423/awlj-v31.a78
Glass Ceilings and Catfights: Career Barriers for Professional Women in Academia
resolves10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031
Knowledge is not power for patients: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making
resolves10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014007246
INVESTIGATING FORTY YEARS OF STEM RESEARCH: HOW EXPLANATIONS FOR THE GENDER GAP HAVE EVOLVED OVER TIME
resolves10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
resolves10.1017/S1537592708080572
Gender Equality in Academia: Bad News from the Trenches, and Some Possible Solutions
resolves10.3386/w5733
Women Helping Women? Role-Model and Mentoring Effects on Female Ph.D. Student in Economics
resolves10.1080/19407882.2019.1568264
Woman–Woman Mentoring Relationships and Their Roles in Tenure Attainment
resolves10.1002/nur.20176
Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings
resolves10.31542/j.ecj.125
Barriers for women to positions of power: How societal and corporate structures, perceptions of leadership and discrimination restrict women’s advancement to authority
resolves10.1023/A:1003901018634
Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis
resolves10.1353/sof.0.0182
Stay in the Game: Gender, Family Formation and Alternative Trajectories in the Academic Life Course
The 8 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedThe transition of women from the academic world to the IT workplace: A review of the relevant research
no DOI — not checkedReconciling the tension between the tenure and biological clocks to increase the recruitment and retention of women in academia
no DOI — not checkedMixed methods systematic reviews: Integrating quantitative and qualitative findings
no DOI — not checkedWomen leadership barriers in healthcare, academia and business. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion
no DOI — not checkedExploding pipelines: Mythological metaphors structuring diversity-oriented engineering education research agendas
no DOI — not checkedMethods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
no DOI — not checkedA review of the literature on barriers encountered by women in science academia
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4007603"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4007603/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4007603)