Reference health
Social Capital in Stressed Social-Ecological Systems: Understanding Social Learning in Agricultural Communities in China To Aid Environmental Policy and Practice
49/49 checkable references clean · checked 2026-09-10
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
25 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 49 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102074
The social structure of climate change research and practitioner engagement: Evidence from California
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.010
Policy support, social capital, and farmers’ adaptation to drought in China
resolves10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.004
Combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital for farm innovation: How farmers configure different support networks
resolves10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.021
A review of assertions about the processes and outcomes of social learning in natural resource management
resolves10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.020
Strategies for building and managing ‘trust’ to enable knowledge exchange at the interface of environmental science and policy
resolves10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.001
Negotiating Indigenous knowledge at the science-policy interface: Insights from the Xáxli’p Community Forest
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.012
Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research
resolves10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.02.006
‘A gentleman's handshake’: The role of social capital and trust in transforming information into usable knowledge
resolves10.1029/2019WR026694
Tailoring Infographics on Water Resources Through Iterative, User‐Centered Design: A Case Study in the Peruvian Andes
resolves10.1002/sd.1611
The Impact of Social Capital on farmers' Willingness to Reuse Agricultural Waste for Sustainable Development
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.249
Mineral N stock and nitrate accumulation in the 50 to 200 m profile on the Loess Plateau
resolves10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.012
Is this what success looks like? Mismatches between the aims, claims, and evidence used to demonstrate impact from knowledge exchange processes at the interface of environmental science and policy
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.02.003
Beyond fragmentation and disconnect: Networks for knowledge exchange in the English land management advisory system
resolves10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.008
Social capital and knowledge sharing performance of learning networks
resolves10.1108/JWL-12-2017-0115
Social learning in smallholder agriculture: the struggle against systemic inequalities
resolves10.1111/1365-2664.12845
Reframing the evidence base for policy‐relevance to increase impact: a case study on forest fragmentation in the oil palm sector
resolves10.1007/s00267-008-9265-5
Social Learning Through Evaluation: A Case Study of Overcoming Constraints for Management of Dryland Salinity
resolves10.1080/1389224X.2011.536356
Organising Collective Action for Effective Environmental Management and Social Learning in Wales
resolves10.1080/1389224X.2011.536362
Social Learning among Organic Farmers and the Application of the Communities of Practice Framework
resolves10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.013
Valuing local knowledge as a source of expert data: Farmer engagement and the design of decision support systems
resolves10.1016/j.agee.2019.106715
How does smallholder farming practice and environmental awareness vary across village communities in the karst terrain of southwest China?
resolves10.5751/ES-01542-110110
The Importance of Social Learning in Restoring the Multifunctionality of Rivers and Floodplains
resolves10.1068/a39253
Experts in Their Fields: Farmer — Expert Knowledges and Environmentally Friendly Farming Practices
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.049
Will farmers work together for conservation? The potential limits of farmers’ cooperation in agri-environment measures
resolves10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.02.006
Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: The role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali
resolves10.1007/s10745-009-9262-1
Social Learning Processes in Swiss Soil Protection—The ‘From Farmer - To Farmer’ Project
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.349
A systematic review on Asian's farmers' adaptation practices towards climate change
resolves10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102824
The role of farmers' social networks in the implementation of no-till farming practices
resolves10.1108/13673270810852395
The knowledge system of a firm: social capital for explicit, tacit and potential knowledge
resolves10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.007
Adaptation and development pathways for different types of farmers
resolves10.1177/1098214005283748
A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104254
Knowledge flows: Farmers’ social relations and knowledge sharing practices in ‘Catchment Sensitive Farming’
resolves10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.021
The Dynamics of Social Capital and Community Associations in Uganda: Linking Capital and its Consequences
resolves10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.01.011
Embeddedness, social capital and learning in rural areas: The case of producer cooperatives
resolves10.1068/a32138
Exploring Knowledge-Cultures: Precision Farming, Yield Mapping, and the Expert–Farmer Interface
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.006
Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research
resolves10.1093/wbro/15.2.225
Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy
resolves10.1073/pnas.1806645115
Policy distortions, farm size, and the overuse of agricultural chemicals in China
resolves10.1021/acs.est.0c04204
Deep
Nitrate Accumulation in a Highly Weathered Subtropical
Critical Zone Depends on the Regolith Structure and Planting Year
resolves10.1111/joac.12117
Land Transfer and the Pursuit of Agricultural Modernization in<scp>C</scp>hina
resolves10.1016/j.envsci.2018.09.021
Knowledge management across the environment-policy interface in China: What knowledge is exchanged, why, and how is this undertaken?
The 25 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedEvaluating social learning in England flood risk management: An 'individual-community interaction' perspective
no DOI — not checkedThe forms of capital
no DOI — not checkedCo-producing knowledge
no DOI — not checkedBarriers and Opportunities for Actionable Knowledge Production in Drought Risk Management: Embracing the Frontiers of Co-production
no DOI — not checkedSoil functions and ecosystem services research in the Chinese karst Critical Zone
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedNegotiating the boundary between state-led and farmer approaches to knowing nature: An analysis of UK agri-environment schemes
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedThe ecological knowledge system
no DOI — not checkedConceptualizations of local knowledge in collaborative environmental governance
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedKeeping the Actors in the Organic System Learning: The Role of Organic Farmers' Experiments
no DOI — not checkedref65
no DOI — not checkedClimate change vulnerability assessment for smallholder farmers in China: An extended framework
no DOI — not checkedref72
no DOI — not checkedRainfall and conduit drainage combine to accelerate nitrate loss from a karst agroecosystem: Insights from stable isotope tracing and high-frequency nitrate sensing
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-09-10 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4007976"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4007976/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4007976)