Reference health

Smart defaults: Determining the number of default funds in a pension scheme

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4008575
CiteStamped reference-health badge
49/49 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-02

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

18 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 49 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00201.x
GENDER‐BASED RISK AVERSION AND RETIREMENT ASSET ALLOCATION
resolves10.1162/003355301556400
Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment
resolves10.1023/A:1024159730463
An Experiment Testing the Determinants of Non-Compliance with Insider Trading Laws
resolves10.1257/aer.102.3.300
How Financial Literacy Affects Household Wealth Accumulation
resolves10.1016/j.jedc.2013.11.001
Age-dependent investing: Optimal funding and investment strategies in defined contribution pension plans when members are rational life cycle financial planners
resolves10.1007/s11166-019-09315-3
Gender effects for loss aversion: Yes, no, maybe?
resolves10.1007/s10551-012-1293-7
Hidden Connections: The Link Between Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Social Performance
resolves10.1016/j.irfa.2017.12.008
Why are older investors less willing to take financial risks?
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2017.11.022
One size fits all? Tailoring retirement plan defaults
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00883.x
Household Finance
resolves10.1257/aer.97.3.745
Estimating Risk Preferences from Deductible Choice
resolves10.1257/jel.47.2.448
Gender Differences in Preferences
resolves10.16935/ejss.2013.29..004
Educational Achievement as a Mediator Between Gender and Financial Risk Tolerance: An Exploratory Study
resolves10.1111/jofi.12697
On the Asset Allocation of a Default Pension Fund
resolves10.1093/rof/rfn023
An Experimental Test of the Impact of Overconfidence and Gender on Trading Activity
resolves10.1111/ecoj.12447
Retirement Savings: A Tale of Decisions and Defaults
resolves10.1257/aer.100.3.1238
Are Risk Aversion and Impatience Related to Cognitive Ability?
resolves10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00169-X
Are women really the “fairer” sex? Corruption and women in government
resolves10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00113-8
Chapter 113 Men, Women and Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence
resolves10.1002/9780470977811
Cluster Analysis
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2013.1849
Financial Literacy, Financial Education, and Downstream Financial Behaviors
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2015.2294
A Reconsideration of Gender Differences in Risk Attitudes
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2017.03.006
Gender differences in financial risk tolerance
resolves10.7249/WR762
What Explains the Gender Gap in Financial Literacy? The Role of Household Decision-Making
resolves10.1093/rfs/14.1.1
Learning to Be Overconfident
resolves10.1108/02652320510629917
Pensions and retirement savings: cluster analysis of consumer behaviour and attitudes
resolves10.1080/13669870802090390
The influence of mood on the willingness to take financial risks
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01701.x
IQ and Stock Market Participation
resolves10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.6.1109
Risk Aversion, Wealth, and Background Risk
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.02.007
Time varying risk aversion
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2017.06.010
Measures of individual risk attitudes and portfolio choice: Evidence from pension participants
resolves10.1057/grir.2009.6
Effects of Health and Longevity on Financial Risk Tolerance
resolves10.1108/02686901211186126
Male and female auditors' overconfidence
resolves10.1111/1540-6261.00556
Good Day Sunshine: Stock Returns and the Weather
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.03.008
Time is money: Rational life cycle inertia and the delegation of investment management
resolves10.1162/REST_a_00053
Do Older Investors Make Better Investment Decisions?
resolves10.1002/hec.1562
Does health affect portfolio choice?
resolves10.3905/jor.2020.1.081
A Framework for Designing Investment Strategies for Default Retirement Plans
resolves10.1017/S1474747211000448
Financial literacy around the world: an overview
resolves10.1257/jel.52.1.5
The Economic Importance of Financial Literacy: Theory and Evidence
resolves10.4324/9781315269887
Gender and Risk-Taking
resolves10.2469/faj.v48.n6.32
Asset Allocation and Individual Risk Aversion
resolves10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.05.018
Household preferences for socially responsible investments
resolves10.1348/096317908X337725
Evidence of lower risk tolerance among public sector employees in their personal financial matters
resolves10.3905/jpm.1989.409238
The judgment of economic science on rational portfolio management
resolves10.2469/faj.v55.n5.2297
Investors' Asset Allocations versus Life-Cycle Funds
resolves10.1257/aer.89.2.381
Financial Decision-Making: Are Women Really More Risk Averse?
resolves10.1509/jppm.10.114
Choice without Awareness: Ethical and Policy Implications of Defaults
resolves10.2469/faj.v63.n4.4749
Gender Differences in Risk Aversion and Expected Retirement Benefits
The 18 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedRisk aversion and pension investment choices
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedQuantifying loss aversion: Evidence from a UK population survey. Working paper
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedDeterminants of risk tolerance in the baby boomer cohort
no DOI — not checkedIncorporating employee heterogeneity into default rules for retirement plan selection
no DOI — not checkedAn empirical investigation of personal financial risk tolerance
no DOI — not checkedAre women conservative investors? Gender differences in participant-directed pension investments
no DOI — not checkedTwo plus two makes five? Survey evidence that investors overvalue structured deposits
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedA New Pension Settlement for the Twenty-First Century: The Second Report of the Pensions Commission. The Stationery Office
no DOI — not checkedGender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedref63
no DOI — not checkedref64
no DOI — not checkedref65
no DOI — not checkedThe effect of gender and marital status on financial risk tolerance
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-02 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4008575"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4008575/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4008575/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4008575)