Predicting the Slump of Industrially Produced Concrete from Mixture Proportions: Insights from Statistical Analysis, Data Visualization and Machine Learning
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
21 without a DOI — not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked
set, and this line discloses that.
Can the compressive strength of concrete be estimated from knowledge of the mixture proportions?: New insights from statistical analysis and machine learning methods
An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests.
Offshore benthic habitat mapping based on object-based image analysis and geomorphometric approach. A case study from the Slupsk Bank, Southern Baltic Sea
Comparison between Statistical Models and Machine Learning Methods on Classification for Highly Imbalanced Multiclass Kidney Data
The 21 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedImplementation of the use of hydration stabilizer admixtures at a ready-mix concrete plant, Case Stud
no DOI — not checkedMaterials discovery and design using machine learning
no DOI — not checkedPrediction of concrete compressive strength and slump by machine learning methods
no DOI — not checkedIn-situ concrete slump test incorporating deep learning and stereo vision
no DOI — not checkedVisualization of concrete slump flow using the kinect sensor
no DOI — not checkedDeep learning approach for estimating workability of self-compacting concrete from mixing image sequences
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedSupporting regularized logistic regression privately and efficiently
no DOI — not checkedFeature selection, L1 vs. L2 regularization, and rotational invariance
no DOI — not checkedPrediction of surface chloride concentration of marine concrete using ensemble machine learning
no DOI — not checkedEvaluation measures for models assessment over imbalanced data sets
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedA comparison of MCC and CEN error measures in multi-class prediction
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself
retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing
about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references
deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-10-15 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.