Reference health
Using Publicly Available Remote Sensing Products to Evaluate REDD+ Projects in Brazil
41/41 checkable references clean · checked 2026-09-21
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
15 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 41 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746
Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program
resolves10.3368/le.88.4.613
Forest Conservation and Slippage: Evidence from Mexico’s National Payments for Ecosystem Services Program
resolves10.3368/le.88.2.382
Do Payments for Environmental Services Affect Forest Cover? A Farm-Level Evaluation from Costa Rica
resolves10.3389/ffgc.2019.00047
Climate Benefits of Intact Amazon Forests and the Biophysical Consequences of Disturbance
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2017.07.008
Indigenous land rights and deforestation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon
resolves10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.006
Evaluating forest conservation policies in developing countries using remote sensing data: An introduction and practical guide
resolves10.1016/j.jag.2019.04.004
Global data and tools for local forest cover loss and REDD+ performance assessment: Accuracy, uncertainty, complementarity and impact
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2015.08.003
Impact of foot-and-mouth disease status on deforestation in Brazilian Amazon and cerrado municipalities between 2000 and 2010
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2018.06.006
Agricultural innovation and climate change policy in the Brazilian Amazon: Intensification practices and the derived demand for pasture
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102572
Impacts of conservation incentives in protected areas: The case of Bolsa Floresta, Brazil
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2013.01.001
Dynamics of indirect land-use change: Empirical evidence from Brazil
resolves10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112310
Forest fires and deforestation in the central Amazon: Effects of landscape and climate on spatial and temporal dynamics
resolves10.1093/reep/rer019
Forest Figures: Ecosystem Services Valuation and Policy Evaluation in Developing Countries
resolves10.1016/j.agee.2012.04.017
Payment for Ecosystem Services: The roles of positive incentives and information sharing in stimulating adoption of silvopastoral conservation practices
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102452
Commodity prices and robust environmental regulation: Evidence from deforestation in Brazil
resolves10.1073/pnas.1802877116
Impacts of protected areas vary with the level of government: Comparing avoided deforestation across agencies in the Brazilian Amazon
resolves10.1017/S0376892916000308
Forest conservation incentives and deforestation in the Ecuadorian Amazon
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0141380
Estimating the Counterfactual Impact of Conservation Programs on Land Cover Outcomes: The Role of Matching and Panel Regression Techniques
resolves10.1007/s11111-019-00326-5
People and Pixels 20 years later: the current data landscape and research trends blending population and environmental data
resolves10.1086/712586
Introduction to Causal Inference in Environmental and Resource Economics: Challenges, Developments, and Applications
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102490
Environmental policies that shape productivity: Evidence from cattle ranching in the Amazon
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.038
Beneath the Canopy: Tropical Forests Enrolled in Conservation Payments Reveal Evidence of Less Degradation
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105660
Sustainability of agricultural production following deforestation in the tropics: Evidence on the value of newly-deforested, long-deforested and forested land in the Brazilian Amazon
resolves10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110736
How forest data catalysed change in four successful case studies
resolves10.1073/pnas.1214786110
Governance regime and location influence avoided deforestation success of protected areas in the Brazilian Amazon
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0147829
Evaluation of the Permanence of Land Use Change Induced by Payments for Environmental Services in Quindío, Colombia
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2018.01.008
Re-election incentives and deforestation cycles in the Brazilian Amazon
resolves10.1093/reep/req006
Show Me the Money: Do Payments Supply Environmental Services in Developing Countries?
resolves10.3368/le.89.3.432
Ecopayments and Deforestation in Costa Rica: A Nationwide Analysis of PSA’s Initial Years
resolves10.1073/pnas.1904027116
Evidence that a national REDD+ program reduces tree cover loss and carbon emissions in a high forest cover, low deforestation country
resolves10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00751.x
Costa Rica's Payment for Environmental Services Program: Intention, Implementation, and Impact
resolves10.1017/S037689291100052X
Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for ecosystem services in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews
resolves10.1093/ajae/aay028
Effectiveness of a REDD+ Project in Reducing Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2016.11.010
Parks versus PES: Evaluating direct and incentive-based land conservation in Mexico
resolves10.1111/cobi.12318
Improving Environmental and Social Targeting through Adaptive Management in Mexico's Payments for Hydrological Services Program
The 15 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedOnly one tree from each seed? Environmental effectiveness and poverty alleviation in Mexico's Payments for Ecosystem Services Program
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedForest cover effects of payments for ecosystem services: Evidence from an impact evaluation in Brazil
no DOI — not checkedDetermining a Threshold to Delimit the Amazonian Forests from the Tree Canopy Cover 2000 GFC Data
no DOI — not checkedSelection biases and spillovers from collective conservation incentives in the Peruvian Amazon
no DOI — not checkedAssessing lack of common support in causal inference using Bayesian nonparametrics: Implications for evaluating the effect of breastfeeding on children's cognitive outcomes
no DOI — not checkedCoordena��o Geral de Observa��o da Terra
no DOI — not checkedReduce Deforestation
no DOI — not checkedSlowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains
no DOI — not checkedGrowth, deforestation and the efficiency of the REDD mechanism
no DOI — not checkedEffects of payment for environmental services (PES) on deforestation and poverty in low and middle income countries: a systematic review
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedREDD+ projects in 2014: an overview based on a new database and typology
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-09-21 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4090218"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4090218/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4090218)