Reference health
The Asebio Index for Monitoring Ecosystem Services: Comparison of Data-Based Modelling with Stakeholders’ Approach
72/72 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
38 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 72 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151229
How much do we know about trade-offs in ecosystem services? A systematic review of empirical research observations
resolves10.1021/es300157u
Quantifying and Mapping Ecosystem Services Supplies and Demands: A Review of Remote Sensing Applications
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004
A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.016
Spatio-temporal trends and trade-offs in ecosystem services: An Earth observation based assessment for Switzerland between 2004 and 2014
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.005
Mapping and modelling ecosystem services for science, policy and practice
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107660
Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders: An integrative assessment based on land cover
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.08.005
Assessing the impact of land-cover changes on ecosystem services: A first step toward integrative planning in Bordeaux, France
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127551
The economic and ecological benefits of saving ecosystems to protect services
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101410
Classifying the content of social media images to support cultural ecosystem service assessments using deep learning models
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.009
Coupling stakeholder assessments of ecosystem services with biophysical ecosystem properties reveals importance of social contexts
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.043
Combining social media photographs and species distribution models to map cultural ecosystem services: The case of a Natural Park in Portugal
resolves10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.003
Priorities to Advance Monitoring of Ecosystem Services Using Earth Observation
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.002
The authorship structure of “ecosystem services” as a transdisciplinary field of scholarship
resolves10.1073/pnas.0706559105
An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation
resolves10.1006/jema.2000.0330
Application of CORINE land-cover mapping to estimate carbon stored in the vegetation of Ireland
resolves10.1007/s10661-021-09336-z
Carbon sequestration scenarios in Portugal: which way to go forward?
resolves10.1017/S0376892911000506
Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.04.005
Including multiple differing stakeholder values into vulnerability assessments of socio-ecological systems
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01653.x
Impact of changing wood demand, climate and land use on European forest resources and carbon stocks during the 21st century
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123510
Impacts of policy on urban energy metabolism at tackling climate change: The case of Lisbon
resolves10.1002/joc.5086
WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007
The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes
resolves10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.10.007
Assessing how green space types affect ecosystem services delivery in Porto, Portugal
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.012
Review of decision support tools to operationalize the ecosystem services concept
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.155
Relationship between ecological condition and ecosystem services in European rivers, lakes and coastal waters
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016
Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: A decision tree approach
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005
Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services
resolves10.1111/j.1475-2743.2000.tb00168.x
Increased predicted losses of phosphorus to surface waters from soils with high Olsen‐P concentrations
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0135125
Impacts of the 2011 Tsunami on Sediment Characteristics and Macrozoobenthic Assemblages in a Shallow Eutrophic Lagoon, Sendai Bay, Japan
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010
A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning
resolves10.1080/07352689891304249
Soil Erosion Impact on Agronomic Productivity and Environment Quality
resolves10.1007/s10113-018-1457-9
Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation
resolves10.1016/j.agee.2012.12.001
Quantifying and mapping multiple ecosystem services change in West Africa
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.037
How to overcome the implementation gap in ecosystem services? A user-friendly and inclusive tool for improved urban management
resolves10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.023
Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004
Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union
resolves10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00166-9
Potential environmental effects of corn (Zea mays L.) stover removal with emphasis on soil organic matter and erosion
resolves10.3390/ijgi10040262
Modelling Sediment Retention Services and Soil Erosion Changes in Portugal: A Spatio-Temporal Approach
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.011
Participatory selection of ecosystem services for spatial planning: Insights from the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, Portugal
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056
Pathways of demographic and urban development and their effects on land take and ecosystem services: The case of Lisbon Metropolitan Area, Portugal
resolves10.1007/s11269-011-9946-3
Catchment Phosphorous Losses: An Export Coefficient Modelling Approach with Scenario Analysis for Water Management
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.011
Tools for spatially modeling ecosystem services: Publication trends, conceptual reflections and future challenges
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.003
European Soil Data Centre: Response to European policy support and public data requirements
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.150
Reimagining the potential of Earth observations for ecosystem service assessments
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.227
Empirical validation of the InVEST water yield ecosystem service model at a national scale
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.032
Spatio-temporal dynamics of critical ecosystem services in response to agricultural expansion in Rwanda, East Africa
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.07.071
Sensitivity analysis of ecosystem service valuation in a Mediterranean watershed
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x
A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead
resolves10.1080/21513732.2017.1297331
Analysing carbon sequestration and storage dynamics in a changing mountain landscape in Portugal: insights for management and planning
resolves10.1038/s41586-020-2189-9
The projected timing of abrupt ecological disruption from climate change
resolves10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.09.023
Ecosystem services accounts: Valuing the actual flow of nature-based recreation from ecosystems to people
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0091001
A Methodology for Adaptable and Robust Ecosystem Services Assessment
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107449
Scientific research on ecosystem services and human well-being: A bibliometric analysis
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.010
Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100938
Stakeholder perspectives on ecosystem service supply and ecosystem service demand bundles
The 38 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedConservation of the coral community and local stakeholders' perceptions of climate change impacts: Examples and gap analysis in three Japanese national parks
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedSynergies, Tradeoffs, and Losses of Ecosystem Services in Urban Regions: an Integrated Multiscale Framework Applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedEnracinements compar�s du Ch�ne sessile, du Ch�ne p�doncul� et du H�tre. R�flexions sur l'aut�cologie des essences
no DOI — not checkedref69
no DOI — not checkedref70
no DOI — not checkedref71
no DOI — not checkedref73
no DOI — not checkedref75
no DOI — not checkedPortuguese National Inventory Report on Greenhouse Gases, 1990-2007 submitted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol
no DOI — not checkedref79
no DOI — not checkedref81
no DOI — not checkedThe analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used
no DOI — not checkedBenefits of Stakeholder integration in an ecosystem services assessment of Mount Carmel Biosphere Reserve
no DOI — not checkedref88
no DOI — not checkedref89
no DOI — not checkedref91
no DOI — not checkedref93
no DOI — not checkedIntegrating ecosystem services into sustainable landscape management: A collaborative approach
no DOI — not checkedref95
no DOI — not checkedref97
no DOI — not checkedref99
no DOI — not checkedIntegrating conservation targets and ecosystem services in landscape spatial planning from Portugal
no DOI — not checkedref103
no DOI — not checkedPredicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide to conservation planning
no DOI — not checkedThe influence of land cover change during sixty years on non-point source phosphorus loads to Gulf of Gdansk
no DOI — not checkedThe Global Risks Report
no DOI — not checkedref109
no DOI — not checkedref110
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4098735"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4098735/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4098735)