An Interpretable Deep Learning Approach for Automatic Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis and Acanthamoeba Keratitis Based on an Introduced Database of in Vivo Confocal Microscopic Images
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
17 without a DOI — not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked
set, and this line discloses that.
A Deep Learning Algorithm for Prediction of Age-Related Eye Disease Study Severity Scale for Age-Related Macular Degeneration from Color Fundus Photography
Inflammation and the Nervous System: The Connection in the Cornea in Patients with Infectious Keratitis
The 17 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedAutomatic feature learning for glaucoma detection based on deep learning
no DOI — not checkedDevelopment of machine learning models for diagnosis of glaucoma
no DOI — not checkedDeep learning-based automated diagnosis of fungal keratitis with in vivo confocal microscopy images
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedData augmentation for improving deep learning in image classification problem
no DOI — not checkedDeep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
no DOI — not checkedCSPNet: A new backbone that can enhance learning capability of CNN
no DOI — not checkedAggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networks
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedUnderstanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedClinical in vivo confocal microscopy of the human cornea in health and disease
no DOI — not checkedref35
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself
retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing
about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references
deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-10-18 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.