Reference health
Early Prompt and Response: The Effects of Auditors’ Responses to Quarterly Management Assessment on Auditors’ Going Concern Reporting Judgments
48/48 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
21 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 48 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.293
Imagination and expectation: The effect of imagining behavioral scripts on personal influences.
resolves10.1111/1911-3846.12059
Being a Successful Professional: An Exploration of Who Makes Partner in the Big 4
resolves10.1111/1911-3846.12560
Implications of the Joint Provision of CSR Assurance and Financial Audit for Auditors' Assessment of Going‐Concern Risk
resolves10.2308/accr.2008.83.6.1461
Reducing Management’s Influence on Auditors’ Judgments: An Experimental Investigation of SOX 404 Assessments
resolves10.1002/9780470752937.ch12
A Tale of Tuned Decks? Anchoring as Accessibility and Anchoring as Adjustment
resolves10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.421
Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior.
resolves10.1037/0021-9010.64.5.533
Transmission of positive and negative feedback to subordinates: A laboratory investigation.
resolves10.1016/j.jcps.2008.01.002
Should we ask our children about sex, drugs and rock & roll? Potentially harmful effects of asking questions about risky behaviors
resolves10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00017-X
On the role of the organization in auditors’ client-acceptance decisions
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101497
Insights into auditor public oversight boards: Whether, how, and why they “work”
resolves10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.759
The Effect of Quality Assessment and Directional Goal Commitment on Auditors' Acceptance of Client-Preferred Accounting Methods
resolves10.2308/accr-50279
Do Going Concern Audit Reports Protect Auditors from Litigation? A Simultaneous Equations Approach
resolves10.2307/2490590
An Investigation into Auditors' Continuity and Related Qualification Judgments
resolves10.1111/j.1475-679X.2011.00423.x
Closing the Loop: Review Process Factors Affecting Audit Staff Follow-Through
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2016.02.001
Does PCAOB inspection access improve audit quality? An examination of foreign firms listed in the United States
resolves10.1506/car.26.1.7
Does Client Importance Affect Auditor Independence at the Office Level? Empirical Evidence from Going‐Concern Opinions*
resolves10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_8
The Mere‐Measurement Effect: Why Does Measuring Intentions Change Actual
Behavior?
resolves10.2308/aud.2008.27.1.151
Audit Documentation Methods: A Path Model of Cognitive Processing, Memory, and Performance
resolves10.1111/1099-1123.00335
Theory and Experimentation in Studies of Audit Judgments and Decisions: Avoiding Common Research Traps
resolves10.2308/ajpt-10171
Documentation Requirements and Quantified versus Qualitative Audit Risk Assessments
resolves10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00010-6
Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions
resolves10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00002-0
The persuasiveness of audit evidence: The case of accounting policy decisions
resolves10.1111/1468-5957.00386
Professionalism vs Commercialism: The Association Between Non‐Audit Services (NAS) and Audit Independence
resolves10.1016/j.pec.2015.08.023
The impact of delivery style on doctors’ experience of stress during simulated bad news consultations
resolves10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123
Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements
resolves10.2308/TAR-2019-0432
Management Going Concern Disclosure, Mitigation Plan, and Failure Prediction—Implications from ASU 2014-15
resolves10.1080/10463283.2016.1245940
The question-behaviour effect: A theoretical and methodological review and meta-analysis
resolves10.1177/1088868315592334
The Impact of Asking Intention or Self-Prediction Questions on Subsequent Behavior
The 21 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedGoing concern opinions and the market's reaction to bankruptcy filings
no DOI — not checkedAre auditors rewarded for low audit quality? The case of auditor lenience in the insurance industry
no DOI — not checkedUpdate No. 2014-15-Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
no DOI — not checkedKPMG stands by audits of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank
no DOI — not checkedFairness as a dependent variable: Why tough times can lead to bad management
no DOI — not checkedThe difficult client-acceptance decision in Canadian audit firms: A field investigation
no DOI — not checkedThe relationship between client advocacy and audit experience: An exploratory analysis
no DOI — not checkedProposed International Standard on Auditing 570 (Revised 202X) Going Concern and Proposed Conforming and Consequential Amendments to Other ISAs
no DOI — not checkedMitigating the consequences of anchoring in auditor judgments
no DOI — not checkedThe role of affect in decision making
no DOI — not checkedPCAOB Standard-Setting Update
no DOI — not checkedReviews of Interim Financial Information
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedStatement on the Continued Importance of High-Quality Financial Reporting for Investors in Light of COVID-19
no DOI — not checkedThe effect of partner compensation schemes and generally accepted accounting principles on audit partner judgment
no DOI — not checkedref64
no DOI — not checkedThe need to control for regression to the mean in social psychology studies
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4120500"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4120500/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4120500)