Reference health
Free-Floating Car Sharing Operation Area Performance: A Bayesian Idle Time Prediction Approach
24/24 checkable references clean · checked 2026-09-16
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
11 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 24 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000102
Hazard-Based Analysis of Travel Distance in Urban Environments: Longitudinal Data Approach
resolves10.1016/j.amar.2020.100143
Hazard-based duration analysis of the time between motorcyclists’ initial training and their first crash
resolves10.1016/j.trc.2017.06.008
Modeling free-floating car-sharing use in Switzerland: A spatial regression and conditional logit approach
resolves10.1016/0191-2615(96)00007-0
A generalized multiple durations proportional hazard model with an application to activity behavior during the evening work-to-home commute
resolves10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.10.013
Watching the clock on the way to work? Analysing trends in commuting activities, modes and gender differences in commute times, using hazard-based duration modelling methods
resolves10.1287/trsc.2020.1028
A Data-Driven Method for Reconstructing a Distribution from a Truncated Sample with an Application to Inferring Car-Sharing Demand
resolves10.1016/j.trc.2020.102775
Estimating latent demand of shared mobility through censored Gaussian Processes
resolves10.1109/ITSC.2019.8916869
Avoiding stranded bicycles in free-floating bicycle-sharing systems: using survival analysis to derive operational rules for rebalancing
resolves10.1080/01441649408716866
Hazard‐based duration models and their application to transport analysis
resolves10.1016/j.ssci.2012.11.009
Estimating freeway incident duration using accelerated failure time modeling
resolves10.1007/s11116-015-9606-1
Do sharing people behave differently? An empirical evaluation of the distinctive mobility patterns of free-floating car-sharing members
resolves10.1016/j.trd.2014.07.005
A new approach to predict the market and impacts of round-trip and point-to-point carsharing systems: Case study of London
resolves10.1080/15568318.2012.660104
Understanding the Factors Affecting Vehicle Usage and Availability in Carsharing Networks: A Case Study of Communauto Carsharing System from Montréal, Canada
resolves10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.008
Modelling the impact of causal and non-causal factors on disruption duration for Toronto’s subway system: An exploratory investigation using hazard modelling
resolves10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.192
Predicting Carsharing Station-Based Trip Generation Using a Growth Model
resolves10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.03.010
Understanding car sharing preferences and mode substitution patterns: A stated preference experiment
resolves10.1016/j.trd.2019.10.011
Analysis of transit users’ waiting tolerance in response to unplanned service disruptions
resolves10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.033
Analyzing External Factors on the Spatial and Temporal Demand of Car Sharing Systems
resolves10.1016/j.trc.2015.03.008
Empirical analysis of free-floating carsharing usage: The Munich and Berlin case
resolves10.1016/j.retrec.2015.10.012
Enabling sustainable transportation: The model-based determination of business/operating areas of free-floating carsharing systems
The 11 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedComparing car-sharing schemes in Switzerland: User groups and usage patterns
no DOI — not checkedStan: A probabilistic programming language
no DOI — not checkedRegression Models and Life-Tables
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedCarsharing systems demand estimation and defined operations: A literature review
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedCar sharing adoption intention in urban areas: What are the key sociodemographic drivers?
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedEvaluation methods for the impacts of shared mobility: Classification and critical review
no DOI — not checkedSurvival analysis of urban traffic incident duration: A case study at shanghai expressways
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-09-16 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4129694"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4129694/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4129694)