Reference health
Women on Boards: Does Corporate Culture Influence Board Gender Diversity?
75/75 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-29
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
28 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 75 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2018.09.004
Do women managers keep firms out of trouble? Evidence from corporate litigation and policies
resolves10.1093/qje/qjr049
The Changing of the Boards: The Impact on Firm Valuation of Mandated Female Board Representation *
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1110.1348
The Impact of Gender Composition on Team Performance and Decision Making: Evidence from the Field
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.1997.tb00545.x
An Examination of Moral Development within Public Accounting by Gender, Staff Level, and Firm*
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02157.x
Glass Ceilings or Sticky Floors? Statistical Discrimination in a Dynamic Model of Hiring and Promotion
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.951
Constraints and triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiation.
resolves10.1111/1467-8683.00052
Women Directors: Selection, Acceptance and Benefits of Board Membership
resolves10.1007/s10997-010-9161-2
Breaking the boardroom gender barrier: the human capital of female corporate directors
resolves10.1080/00223980.1988.9915532
The Gender Gap on Wall Street: An Empirical Analysis of Confidence in Investment Decision Making
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.008
CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation
resolves10.1126/science.aas9899
Relationship of gender differences in preferences to economic development and gender equality
resolves10.1023/A:1005711905297
Gender, Exposure to Tax Knowledge, and Attitudes Towards Taxation; An Experimental Approach
resolves10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00082.x
Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks
resolves10.1111/1911-3846.12098
Gender Differences in Financial Reporting Decision Making: Evidence from Accounting Conservatism
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.427
Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity.
resolves10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00689.x
PREDICTING CORPORATE PERFORMANCE FROM ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE*
resolves10.1111/j.1571-9979.2008.00200.x
Propensity to Negotiate and Career Advancement: Evidence from an Investment Bank that Women Are on a “Slow Elevator”
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.12.005
Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives?
resolves10.1007/s10551-008-0018-4
Women and Employee-Elected Board Members, and Their Contributions to Board Control Tasks
resolves10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00382.x
The Information Content of Forward‐Looking Statements in Corporate Filings—A Naïve Bayesian Machine Learning Approach
resolves10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00697.x
National Culture and the Composition and Leadership Structure of Boards of Directors
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01625.x
When Is a Liability Not a Liability? Textual Analysis, Dictionaries, and 10‐Ks
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.02.017
IPO first-day returns, offer price revisions, volatility, and form S-1 language
resolves10.1002/job.402
An embeddedness framing of governance and opportunism: towards a cross‐nationally accommodating theory of agency
resolves10.1257/aer.101.3.635
Chipping away at the Glass Ceiling: Gender Spillovers in Corporate Leadership
resolves10.1007/s10551-012-1576-z
Are Demographic Attributes and Firm Characteristics Drivers of Gender Diversity? Investigating Women’s Positions on French Boards of Directors
resolves10.1007/s10551-006-9164-8
Women’s Roles on U.S. Fortune 500 Boards: Director Expertise and Committee Memberships
resolves10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01118.x
The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation
resolves10.1287/mnsc.29.1.33
Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence
resolves10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363
A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629
Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management.
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1004
Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers.
resolves10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490030
Understanding Compensation Practice Variations Across Firms: The Impact of National Culture
resolves10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010
Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies.
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.003
Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk?
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.600
Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation.
resolves10.1007/s10551-015-2974-9
Why so Few Women on Boards of Directors? Empirical Evidence from Danish Companies in 1998–2010
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.01.004
Female leadership and gender equity: Evidence from plant closure
The 28 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedFamily, Values, and Women in Finance
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedDynamics of the Gender Gap for Young Professionals in the Financial and Corporate Sectors
no DOI — not checkedThe Relationship Between Women Corporate Directors and Women Corporate Officers
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedDo board gender quotas affect firm value? Evidence from California Senate Bill No. 826
no DOI — not checkedA Corporate Culture Channel: How Increased Shareholder Governance Reduces Firm Value
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedFacing backlash for its all-male board
no DOI — not checkedWomen Directors' Roles on Corporate Boards: Insights from a Qualitative Study
no DOI — not checkedref69
no DOI — not checkedTextual analysis of corporate disclosures: a survey of the literature
no DOI — not checkedA Female Style in Corporate Leadership?
no DOI — not checkedWhy Goldman Sachs's Push for Diversity Is Unlikely to Drive Real Change
no DOI — not checkedBuilding a Business Case for Diversity
no DOI — not checkedref90
no DOI — not checkedWomen In Management And Firm Financial Performance: An Exploratory Study
no DOI — not checkedGender Differences in the Allocation of Assets in Retirement Savings Plans
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-29 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4130640"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4130640/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4130640)