Reference health
It's Not You (Well, it is a Bit You), It's Me: Self- Versus Social Image in Warm-Glow Giving
55/55 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
13 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 55 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2018.3232
Online Fundraising, Self-Image, and the Long-Term Impact of Ask Avoidance
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2015.12.007
Using descriptive social norms to increase charitable giving: The power of local norms
resolves10.1086/261662
Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence
resolves10.3982/ECTA7384
Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects
resolves10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00040-9
Public goods experiments without confidentiality: a glimpse into fund-raising
resolves10.1086/691703
Avoiding the Ask: A Field Experiment on Altruism, Empathy, and Charitable Giving
resolves10.1257/aer.99.1.544
Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially
resolves10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00044-6
Engineering altruism: a theoretical and experimental investigation of anonymity and gift giving
resolves10.1002/nml.232
Keeping up with the Joneses: The relationship of perceived descriptive social norms, social information, and charitable giving
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.11.005
The hidden costs of nudging: Experimental evidence from reminders in fundraising
resolves10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.10.001
What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Costly (but quiet) exit in dictator games
resolves10.1007/s00199-006-0153-z
Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness
resolves10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.01.006
Do ‘watching eyes’ influence antisocial behavior? A systematic review & meta-analysis
resolves10.1007/s10683-011-9312-6
Do watching eyes affect charitable giving? Evidence from a field experiment
resolves10.3758/BF03193146
G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences
resolves10.1017/S1930297500004009
Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2016.01.011
Sidestepping the rock and the hard place: The private avoidance of prosocial requests
resolves10.1002/jcpy.1010
Projecting Lower Competence to Maintain Moral Warmth in the Avoidance of Prosocial Requests
resolves10.1111/spc3.12297
Unresolved questions in nudging research: Putting the psychology back in nudging
resolves10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.08.004
The watching eyes effect in the Dictator Game: it's not how much you give, it's being seen to give something
resolves10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.07.001
Artificial surveillance cues do not increase generosity: two meta-analyses
resolves10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.12.003
Effect of artificial surveillance cues on reported moral judgment: Experimental failures to replicate and two meta-analyses
resolves10.1111/eth.12011
Eye Images Increase Charitable Donations: Evidence From an Opportunistic Field Experiment in a Supermarket
resolves10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German
resolves10.1007/s40881-015-0006-2
Fair weather avoidance: unpacking the costs and benefits of “Avoiding the Ask”
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2020.02.001
Bracelets of pride and guilt? An experimental test of self-signaling
The 13 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAltruism and prosocial behavior
no DOI — not checkedSelf-perception theory
no DOI — not checkedWhen a nudge backfires: Using observation with social and economic incentives to promote pro-social behavior (No. 2019-03)
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedEngineering human cooperation: Does involuntary neural activation increase public goods contributions in adult humans?
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedFinding excuses to decline the ask
no DOI — not checkedThe backfire effect of default amounts on donation behavior in online donation platform
no DOI — not checkedReplication with Mturk of the experimental design by
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedSocial distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedResisting moral wiggle room: how robust is reciprocal behavior?
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4131071"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4131071/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4131071)