Reference health
The Rhetoric of Reaction Redux
not checkable · checked 2026-08-03
This work could not be checked — none of the deposited references carry a DOI. No claim is made either way about its reference list.
45 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 45 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedThe Effectiveness of Nudging: A Meta-Analysis of Choice Architecture Interventions Across Behavioral Domains, PROC
no DOI — not checkedSimplification and Defaults Affect Adoption and Impact of Technology, but Decision Makers Do Not Realize It, 171 ORG. BEHAV. & HUM. DECISION PROCESSES (forthcoming
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedCalorie Labeling and Food Choice: a First Look at the Effects on Low-Income People
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedLearning From Behavioural Changes that Fail
no DOI — not checkedOn minimum payment requirements and credit card payments
no DOI — not checkedThe Welfare Effects of Nudges
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedRuining Popcorn? The Welfare Effects of Information
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedUses of behavioral science to take advantage of (for example) limited attention or present bias raise important questions, but unless we do some fancy footwork, we are not really speaking of futility, perversity, or jeopardy
no DOI — not checkedShould Governments Invest More in Nudging?
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedThe Influence of Calorie Labeling on Food Orders and Consumption: A Review of the Literature
no DOI — not checkedOn some of the ethical issues here, see Helena Siipi & Polaris Koi, The Ethics of Climate Nudges: Central Issues for Applying Choice Architecture Interventions to Climate Policy, 13 EUR
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedto the effect that nudges, designed to increase screening for breast cancer, can lead people in bad directions. The best response to objections of this kind, when they are convincing, is to nudge better
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedref45
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4133924"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4133924/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4133924)