Reference health
Market Valuation Implications of Scope 2 Carbon Emissions: Measurement Effects of Dual Reporting
22/22 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 22 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.012
Corporate environmental disclosure, financial markets and the media: An international perspective
resolves10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.002
The valuation relevance of environmental performance revisited: The moderating role of environmental provisions
resolves10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2016.04.004
Value relevance of accounting information under an integrated reporting approach: A research note
resolves10.2307/2491446
Estimation and Market Valuation of Environmental Liabilities Relating to Superfund Sites
resolves10.1111/abac.12006
The Cost of Carbon: Capital Market Effects of the Proposed Emission Trading Scheme (<scp>ETS</scp>)
resolves10.1016/j.bar.2020.100909
Does the market value greenhouse gas emissions? Evidence from multi-country firm data
resolves10.1111/abac.12010
The Value Relevance of Direct Cash Flows under International Financial Reporting Standards
resolves10.1080/09638180.2014.927782
The Valuation Relevance of Greenhouse Gas Emissions under the European Union Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme
resolves10.1016/j.bar.2009.03.002
The value relevance and reliability of reported goodwill and identifiable intangible assets
resolves10.1016/j.bar.2015.04.002
Impression management through minimal narrative disclosure in annual reports
resolves10.1108/AAAJ-12-2013-1547
Does stakeholder pressure influence corporate GHG emissions reporting? Empirical evidence from Europe
resolves10.1007/s10551-012-1324-4
Monitoring Intensity and Stakeholders’ Orientation: How Does Governance Affect Social and Environmental Disclosure?
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhs073
Does Beta Move with News? Firm-Specific Information Flows and Learning about Profitability
resolves10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2016.06.009
Value relevance of alleged corporate bribery expenditures implied by accounting information
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedTalking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management, and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedThe Market Value of Decomposed Carbon Emissions
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedThe Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4138430"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4138430/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4138430)