Reference health
The Ease of Travel: A Comprehensible Alternative for Accessibility?
39/39 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
19 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 39 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.trd.2019.102212
Planning transport for social inclusion: An accessibility-activity participation approach
resolves10.1007/s001680200083
The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: A structural equations modeling approach
resolves10.1080/02697459915724
Spatial Development Patterns and Public Transport: The Application of an Analytical Model in the Netherlands
resolves10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.12.011
How to get there? A critical assessment of accessibility objectives and indicators in metropolitan transportation plans
resolves10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.10.006
Same question, different answer: A comparison of GIS-based journey time accessibility with self-reported measures from the National Travel Survey in England
resolves10.1007/s11116-010-9280-2
Modelling the social and psychological impacts of transport disadvantage
resolves10.1007/s11116-017-9812-0
Analysing the effect of trip satisfaction on satisfaction with the leisure activity at the destination of the trip, in relationship with life satisfaction
resolves10.1016/j.tbs.2019.04.001
Effects of changing travel patterns on travel satisfaction: A focus on recently relocated residents
resolves10.1007/s11116-015-9619-9
Travel mode choice and travel satisfaction: bridging the gap between decision utility and experienced utility
resolves10.1080/01441647.2021.1958952
From attitude to satisfaction: introducing the travel mode choice cycle
resolves10.1016/j.tbs.2015.12.002
Do people live in urban neighbourhoods because they do not like to travel? Analysing an alternative residential self-selection hypothesis
resolves10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34
Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index.
resolves10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.12.006
The road to happiness: Measuring Dutch car drivers’ satisfaction with travel
resolves10.1023/A:1017959825565
A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area
resolves10.3141/1607-16
Travel Behavior as Function of Accessibility, Land Use Mixing, and Land Use Balance: Evidence from San Francisco Bay Area
resolves10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
The Benefits of Frequent Positive Affect: Does Happiness Lead to Success?
resolves10.17645/si.v4i3.481
Perceived Accessibility of Public Transport as a Potential Indicator of Social Inclusion
resolves10.1016/j.retrec.2018.06.002
A new approach to accessibility – Examining perceived accessibility in contrast to objectively measured accessibility in daily travel
resolves10.1080/01441647.2018.1492778
Accessibility: measurement and application in transportation planning
resolves10.1080/01441647.2015.1013076
What Moves Us? An Interdisciplinary Exploration of Reasons for Traveling
resolves10.1007/s11116-014-9557-y
What makes travel pleasant and/or tiring? An investigation based on the French National Travel Survey
resolves10.1080/00420980500534677
Accessibility, Activity Participation and Location of Activities: Exploring the Links between Residential Location and Travel Behaviour
resolves10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.11.004
Using self-determination theory to understand motivation for walking: Instrument development and model testing using Bayesian structural equation modelling
resolves10.1348/014466601164704
The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal‐directed behaviours: Broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviour
resolves10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.
resolves10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1552
Neighborhood-Based Differences in Physical Activity: An Environment Scale Evaluation
resolves10.1016/j.jth.2016.01.003
Perceived accessibility is an important factor in transport choice — Results from the AVENUE project
resolves10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.01.002
Transport mobility benefits and quality of life: A time-use perspective of elderly Canadians
resolves10.1016/j.trf.2014.07.004
The happy commuter: A comparison of commuter satisfaction across modes
The 19 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedDo people travel with their preferred travel mode? Analysing the extent of travel mode dissonance and its effect on travel satisfaction
no DOI — not checkedDoes a residential relocation enable satisfying travel?
no DOI — not checkedOn the pivotal role of travel satisfaction in conceptualising a travel behaviour process
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedMaking accessibility work in practice
no DOI — not checkedOut-of-home activities, daily travel, and subjective well-being
no DOI — not checkedAnalyzing motivations for undirected travel
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedDo attitudes cause behavior or vice versa? An alternative conceptualization of the attitude-behavior relationship in travel behavior modeling
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedHow derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations
no DOI — not checkedShould we all just stay home? Travel, out-of-home activities, and life satisfaction
no DOI — not checkedModeling the structural relationships among short-distance travel amounts, perceptions, affections, and desires
no DOI — not checkedPerceived accessibility: What it is and why it differs from calculated accessibility measures based on spatial data
no DOI — not checkedExploring key determinants of travel satisfaction for multi-modal trips by different traveler groups
no DOI — not checkedref58
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4144178"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4144178/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4144178)