Reference health
What Determines Customer Willingness to Travel in Automated Driving Vehicles? The Perspective of Cognitive Appraisal Theory of Emotions
64/64 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-04
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
13 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 64 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.019
How trust can drive forward the user acceptance to the technology? In-vehicle technology for autonomous vehicle
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120688
The role of trust in intention to use the IoT in eHealth: Application of the modified UTAUT in a consumer context
resolves10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019
Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective
resolves10.1177/1088868307301033
How Emotion Shapes Behavior: Feedback, Anticipation, and Reflection, Rather Than Direct Causation
resolves10.1108/JCM-06-2016-1860
Exploring the role of anticipated emotions in product adoption and usage
resolves10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.031
The impact of mortality anxiety on attitude toward product innovation
resolves10.1016/j.trc.2021.103499
Do autonomous vehicles drive like humans? A Turing approach and an application to SAE automation Level 2 cars
resolves10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle
resolves10.1016/j.ecotra.2020.100179
The demand for automated vehicles: A synthesis of willingness-to-pay surveys
resolves10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003
Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations
resolves10.1177/002224378101800104
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
resolves10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.008
Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.088
How to activate moral norm to adopt electric vehicles in China? An empirical study based on extended norm activation theory
resolves10.1108/ITP-01-2020-0005
The role of transaction cost and trust in e-loyalty: a mixed-methods study of ride-sharing
resolves10.1080/10705519909540118
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.006
Analyzing consumer attitudes towards electric vehicle purchasing intentions in Spain: Technological limitations and vehicle confidence
resolves10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.04.006
Trust in driverless cars: Investigating key factors influencing the adoption of driverless cars
resolves10.1016/j.trc.2021.103354
Impact of trust and travel experiences on the value of travel time savings for autonomous driving
resolves10.1080/1743727X.2015.1005806
A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)
resolves10.1016/j.tra.2020.10.008
Positive, negative, ambivalent, or indifferent? Exploring the structure of public attitudes toward self-driving vehicles on public roads
resolves10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.004
Road tests of self-driving vehicles: Affective and cognitive pathways in acceptance formation
resolves10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.01.005
Developing and validating a service robot integration willingness scale
resolves10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.
resolves10.1080/14639220500337708
Similarities and differences between human–human and human–automation trust: an integrative review
resolves10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.05.007
The potential impacts of automated cars on urban transport: An exploratory analysis
resolves10.1108/ITP-11-2019-0602
Trust and elderly users' continuance intention regarding mobile health services: the contingent role of health and technology anxieties
resolves10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.004
Understanding trust and acceptance of automated vehicles: An exploratory simulator study of transfer of control between automated and manual driving
resolves10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.041
Perceived safety and attributed value as predictors of the intention to use autonomous vehicles: A national study with Spanish drivers
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120319
What drives the acceptance of autonomous driving? An investigation of acceptance factors from an end-user's perspective
resolves10.1016/j.trc.2020.02.026
Passenger comfort and trust on first-time use of a shared autonomous shuttle vehicle
resolves10.1016/j.trc.2018.08.013
An empirical investigation on consumers’ intentions towards autonomous driving
resolves10.1016/j.trf.2021.10.006
Factors affecting perceived safety and enjoyment based on driver experience
resolves10.1016/j.chb.2021.106855
What makes an AI device human-like? The role of interaction quality, empathy and perceived psychological anthropomorphic characteristics in the acceptance of artificial intelligence in the service industry
resolves10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.155
Emotion and Rationality: A Critical Review and Interpretation of Empirical Evidence
resolves10.1016/j.elerap.2016.07.001
The effects of perceived enjoyment and perceived risks on trust formation and intentions to use online payment systems: New perspectives from an Arab country
resolves10.1016/j.trc.2018.06.014
Eliciting preferences for adoption of fully automated vehicles using best-worst analysis
resolves10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.
resolves10.1016/j.trb.2020.10.004
The relationship between car following string instability and traffic oscillations in finite-sized platoons and its use in easing congestion via connected and automated vehicles with IDM based controller
resolves10.1016/j.chb.2019.106215
If your device could smile: People trust happy-sounding artificial agents more
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121609
Emotions and consumers’ adoption of innovations: An integrative review and research agenda
resolves10.2307/41410412
Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology1
resolves10.1016/j.trc.2021.103478
Ego-efficient lane changes of connected and automated vehicles with impacts on traffic flow
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005
The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle
resolves10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.029
The role of environmental concern in the public acceptance of autonomous electric vehicles: A survey from China
resolves10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.024
What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment
resolves10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.027
Automated vehicle acceptance in China: Social influence and initial trust are key determinants
The 13 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedUser Acceptance of Computer Technology : A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
no DOI — not checkedAutonomous car acceptance: safety vs. personal driving enjoyment
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedCan Autonomous Vehicles Be Safe and Trustworthy? Effects of Appearance and Autonomy of Unmanned Driving Systems
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedFrontline employee anger in response to customer incivility: Antecedents and consequences
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedMaking robot cars more human. PC Mag. NHTSA, 2013. Early Estimate of Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities in 2012
no DOI — not checkedHow smart, connected products are transforming competition
no DOI — not checkedA Factor Analysis of Consumer Expectations for Autonomous Cars
no DOI — not checkedVenkatesh_et_al-2008-Decision_Sciences
no DOI — not checkedService encounter failure, negative destination emotion and behavioral intention: An experimental study of taxi service
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-04 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4149588"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4149588/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4149588)