Reference health
Can (A)I Give You a Ride? Development and Validation of the CRUISE Framework for Autonomous Vehicle Services
53/53 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
25 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 53 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.04.002
The effects of positive and negative information on consumers’ willingness to ride in a driverless vehicle
resolves10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.004
From semi to fully autonomous vehicles: New emerging risks and ethico-legal challenges for human-machine interactions
resolves10.1111/risa.13190
sCARy! Risk Perceptions in Autonomous Driving: The Influence of Experience on Perceived Benefits and Barriers
resolves10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.021
Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: A simulated driving study
resolves10.1108/JOSM-07-2017-0179
Service robots: value co-creation and co-destruction in elderly care networks
resolves10.3758/s13428-019-01293-3
Survey-software implicit association tests: A methodological and empirical analysis
resolves10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle
resolves10.1109/MSPEC.2021.9423818
Building an AI That Feels: AI systems with emotional intelligence could learn faster and be more helpful
resolves10.1348/014466606X130346
The implicit association test outperforms the extrinsic affective Simon task as an implicit measure of inter‐individual differences in attitudes
resolves10.1007/978-3-662-53305-5_23
Uncanny and Unsafe Valley of Assistance and Automation: First Sketch and Application to Vehicle Automation
resolves10.1093/jcr/ucaa018
Blame It on the Self-Driving Car: How Autonomous Vehicles Can Alter Consumer Morality
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test.
resolves10.1037/a0015575
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.
resolves10.1007/s11747-019-00711-4
The future of technology and marketing: a multidisciplinary perspective
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.011
Not fearless, but self-enhanced: The effects of anxiety on the willingness to use autonomous cars depend on individual levels of self-enhancement
resolves10.1177/0008125619863436
The Feeling Economy: Managing in the Next Generation of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
resolves10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.001
Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age
resolves10.1177/1094670519842334
Service Robots: Drivers of Perceived Responsibility for Service Outcomes
resolves10.1109/CW.2018.00058
Personas and Emotional Design for Public Service Robots: A Case Study with Autonomous Vehicles in Public Transportation
resolves10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.013
Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car
resolves10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014
Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents
resolves10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.001
Parents’ perspectives on using autonomous vehicles to enhance children’s mobility
resolves10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.006
Understanding interactions between Automated Road Transport Systems and other road users: A video analysis
resolves10.1177/0022243718822827
Service Robots Rising: How Humanoid Robots Influence Service Experiences and Elicit Compensatory Consumer Responses
resolves10.1016/j.trf.2020.07.015
Using the UTAUT2 model to explain public acceptance of conditionally automated (L3) cars: A questionnaire study among 9,118 car drivers from eight European countries
resolves10.1007/s11747-018-0608-3
Relationship journeys in the internet of things: a new framework for understanding interactions between consumers and smart objects
resolves10.1007/s43681-021-00041-8
Public acceptance and perception of autonomous vehicles: a comprehensive review
resolves10.1111/risa.13267
The Influence of Feelings While Driving Regular Cars on the Perception and Acceptance of Self‐Driving Cars
resolves10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.029
Cognitive underpinnings of beliefs and confidence in beliefs about fully automated vehicles
resolves10.1016/j.trf.2020.06.005
This is not me! Technology-identity concerns in consumers’ acceptance of autonomous vehicle technology
resolves10.1177/1094670519878881
Robotics for Customer Service: A Useful Complement or an Ultimate Substitute?
resolves10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.024
What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment
resolves10.1109/MNET.2019.1900120
Autonomous Driving Cars in Smart Cities: Recent Advances, Requirements, and Challenges
resolves10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104309
Check-in at the Robo-desk: Effects of automated social presence on social cognition and service implications
resolves10.1177/1094670514559187
The Nature and Implications of Consumers’ Experiential Framings of Failure in High-Risk Service Contexts
The 25 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedEthical issues in service robotics and artificial intelligence
no DOI — not checkedAttitude towards autonomous vehicles among people with physical disabilities
no DOI — not checkedPredictors of attitudes toward autonomous vehicles: The roles of age, gender, prior knowledge, and personality
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedEuropean perceptions of autonomous and robotized cars
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedRise of the machines? Customer engagement in automated service interactions
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedA Framework for Collaborative Artificial Intelligence in Marketing
no DOI — not checkedPeople's attitudes to autonomous vehicles
no DOI — not checkedThe determinants behind the acceptance of autonomous vehicles: A systematic review
no DOI — not checkedSelf-driving vehicles: Are people willing to trade risks for environmental benefits?
no DOI — not checkedRoad tests self-driving vehicles: Affective and cognitive pathways in acceptance formation
no DOI — not checkedPublic attitude toward self-driving vehicles on public roads: Direct experience changed ambivalent people to be more positive
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedConsumer intentions for alternative fuelled and autonomous vehicles: A segmentation analysis across six countries
no DOI — not checkedDo gender and age affect willingness to ride in driverless vehicles: If so, then why?
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedAscribing emotions to robots: Explicit and implicit attribution of emotions and perceived robot anthropomorphism
no DOI — not checkedRisk preference and adoption of autonomous vehicles
no DOI — not checkedAutonomous vehicles, risk perceptions and insurance demand: An individual survey in China
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4152055"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4152055/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4152055)