Reference health
Spatially-Explicit Assessment of Carbon Stocks in the Landscape in the Southern Us Under Different Scenarios of Industrial Wood Pellet Demand
40/40 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
50 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 40 checked references that resolve
resolves10.5849/forsci.11-055
Effect of Bioenergy Demands and Supply Response on Markets, Carbon, and Land Use
resolves10.1080/10549811.2011.652044
Potential Impact of Bioenergy Demand on the Sustainability of the Southern Forest Resource
resolves10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.10.006
Non-industrial private forest owner's willingness-to-harvest: How higher timber prices influence woody biomass supply
resolves10.1038/s41598-020-75403-z
Expansion of US wood pellet industry points to positive trends but the need for continued monitoring
resolves10.1016/j.rse.2007.08.021
Mapping U.S. forest biomass using nationwide forest inventory data and moderate resolution information
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/aaac88
Not carbon neutral: Assessing the net emissions impact of residues burned for bioenergy
resolves10.1111/gcbb.12245
A global meta‐analysis of forest bioenergy greenhouse gas emission accounting studies
resolves10.2134/jeq2005.0198
Effect of Land‐Cover Change on Terrestrial Carbon Dynamics in the Southern United States
resolves10.3934/environsci.2015.2.180
Linking state-and-transition simulation and timber supply models for forest biomass production scenarios
resolves10.1038/srep08002
Complex forest dynamics indicate potential for slowing carbon accumulation in the southeastern United States
resolves10.1111/gcbb.12445
Status and prospects for renewable energy using wood pellets from the southeastern United States
resolves10.1002/eap.1516
Toward inventory‐based estimates of soil organic carbon in forests of the United States
resolves10.1111/gcbb.12554
Impact of increased wood pellet demand on biodiversity in the south‐eastern United States
resolves10.1002/bbb.1803
Modeling the impacts of wood pellet demand on forest dynamics in southeastern United States
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/aaf937
Is wood pellet-based electricity less carbon-intensive than coal-based electricity? It depends on perspectives, baselines, feedstocks, and forest management practices
resolves10.1016/j.forpol.2016.03.002
Efficacy of carbon and bioenergy markets in mitigating carbon emissions on reforested lands: A case study from Southern United States
resolves10.1111/gcbb.12273
Sustainability guidelines and forest market response: an assessment of European Union pellet demand in the southeastern United States
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2015.05.018
The environmental and economic effects of regional bioenergy policy in the southeastern U.S.
resolves10.1111/gcbb.12426
Wood pellets, what else? Greenhouse gas parity times of European electricity from wood pellets produced in the south‐eastern United States using different softwood feedstocks
resolves10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00213-5
Methodology for estimating soil carbon for the forest carbon budget model of the United States, 2001
resolves10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.012
Opportunities and attitudes of private forest landowners in supplying woody biomass for renewable energy
resolves10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900050036x
Carbon Sequestration in an Aggrading Forest Ecosystem in the Southeastern USA
resolves10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.06.017
Carbon balance and economic performance of pine plantations for bioenergy production in the Southeastern United States
resolves10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.005
Determinants of private forest management decisions: A study on West Virginia NIPF landowners
resolves10.1002/bbb.1993
The future of biomass and bioenergy deployment and trade: a synthesis of 15 years IEA Bioenergy Task 40 on sustainable bioenergy trade
resolves10.1016/j.reseneeco.2018.04.003
Cumulative global forest carbon implications of regional bioenergy expansion policies
resolves10.1021/es1024004
Forest Bioenergy or Forest Carbon? Assessing Trade-Offs in Greenhouse Gas Mitigation with Wood-Based Fuels
resolves10.1016/j.envsci.2014.07.006
Forest carbon accounting methods and the consequences of forest bioenergy for national greenhouse gas emissions inventories
resolves10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01147.x
Spatiotemporal land use modelling to assess land availability for energy crops – illustrated for <scp>M</scp>ozambique
resolves10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.08.003
Spatio-temporal uncertainty in Spatial Decision Support Systems: A case study of changing land availability for bioenergy crops in Mozambique
resolves10.1016/j.rser.2019.109506
Wood pellet supply chain costs – A review and cost optimization analysis
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/114019
Carbon savings with transatlantic trade in pellets: accounting for market-driven effects
resolves10.1093/forestry/cpm015
Forest biomass estimated from MODIS and FIA data in the Lake States: MN, WI and MI, USA
The 50 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedProjecting southern timber supply for multiple products by subregion. For
no DOI — not checkedSouthern Forest Source Assessment using the subregional timber supply (SRTS) model. For
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedBiomass Supply and Carbon Accounting for Southeastern Forests
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedThe Development of Pine Plantation Silviculture in the Southern United States
no DOI — not checkedForest Biomass Supply in the Southeastern United States --Implications for Industrial Roundwood and Bioenergy Production
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedWood pellet market and trade: a global perspective
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedModeling future U.S. forest sector market and trade impacts of expansion in wood energy consumption
no DOI — not checkedEffects on U.S. Timber Outlook of Recent Economic Recession
no DOI — not checkedIPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedContemporary carbon dynamics in terrestrial ecosystems in the Southeastern Plains of the United States
no DOI — not checkedForest Carbon Accounting Considerations in US
no DOI — not checkedNatural Resources Defence Council
no DOI — not checkedref61
no DOI — not checkedNatural Forests Are Being Felled to Send Fuel Overseas
no DOI — not checkedref63
no DOI — not checkedImpact of promotion mechanisms for advanced and low-iLUC biofuels on biomass markets: Summary Report
no DOI — not checkedThe southern timber market to 2040
no DOI — not checkedDoes wood bioenergy increase carbon stocks in forests?
no DOI — not checkedref68
no DOI — not checkedProjected gains and losses of wildlife habitat from bioenergy-induced landscape change
no DOI — not checkedThe Burning Question: Does Forest Bioenergy Reduce Carbon Emissions? A Review of Common Misconceptions about Forest Carbon Accounting
no DOI — not checkedThere's a Booming Business in America's Forests. Some Aren't Happy About It
no DOI — not checkedref73
no DOI — not checkedAnnual Market Review 2019-2020 -Forest Products
no DOI — not checkedref75
no DOI — not checkedref76
no DOI — not checkedref77
no DOI — not checkedref78
no DOI — not checkedref79
no DOI — not checkedref83
no DOI — not checkedref84
no DOI — not checkedref86
no DOI — not checkedThink Wood Pellets are Green? Think Again
no DOI — not checkedref89
no DOI — not checkedA Method for Assessing Carbon Stocks, Carbon Sequestration, and Greenhouse-Gas Fluxes in Ecosystems of the United States Under Present Conditions and Future Scenario
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4166140"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4166140/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4166140)