Reference health
A Theoretical and Experimental Evaluation of Pay Transparency Policies and Payment Schemes
34/34 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 34 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.04.001
The importance of relative performance feedback information: Evidence from a natural experiment using high school students
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2011.01.029
Relative performance or team evaluation? Optimal contracts for other-regarding agents
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104890
The salary taboo privacy norms and the diffusion of information
resolves10.1287/orsc.2017.1109
Pay Harmony? Social Comparison and Performance Compensation in Multibusiness Firms
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2017.2907
First-Place Loving and Last-Place Loathing: How Rank in the Distribution of Performance Affects Effort Provision
resolves10.1257/aer.102.1.469
A Structural Analysis of Disappointment Aversion in a Real Effort Competition
resolves10.1007/s10683-015-9465-9
Combining “real effort” with induced effort costs: the ball-catching task
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2010.08.008
Social comparison and performance: Experimental evidence on the fair wage–effort hypothesis
resolves10.2308/accr.2008.83.4.893
The Effects of Disseminating Relative Performance Feedback in Tournament and Individual Performance Compensation Plans
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2013.1760
Optimal Design of Social Comparison Effects: Setting Reference Groups and Reference Points
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x
The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.05.004
Rank as an inherent incentive: Evidence from a field experiment
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedPay transparency and the gender gap
no DOI — not checkedPay transparency and gender equality
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedFeedback and motivation in dynamic tournaments
no DOI — not checkedPay transparency and inventor productivity: Evicence from state-level pay secrecy laws
no DOI — not checkedDoes pay transparency affect the gender wage gap? evidence from austria
no DOI — not checkedref36
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4172506"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4172506/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4172506)